| |
Concept:
|
AbessiveCase
|
Definition:
| AbessiveCase expresses the lack or absence of the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning of the English preposition 'without' (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 3,35; Gove, et al. 1966: 3).
|
Example:
|
|
|
| Language: |
Finnish |
| Source: |
Branch (1987:607) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AblativeCase
|
Definition:
| AblativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from'.
|
Comment:
|
Lake Miwok has ten case enclitics, illustrated in the examples. In the vocative example, the gram marked as VOC is specific to 'mother'. Other kinship terms have their own special vocative forms.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| A flea is sitting on your forehead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He's standing in front of the king |
|
|
|
|
| He brought them to the king |
|
|
|
|
| The cat came out of there |
|
|
kaʔáppi -
father-
|
ni
COMIT
|
|
|
| I am walking with my father |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Miwok, Lake |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:204-6),Callaghan (1963) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AbsoluteFutureTense
|
Definition:
| AbsoluteFutureTense locates the event in question subsequent
to the present moment; it is a prediction of some state of affairs (Comrie
1985: 43-44).
|
Comment:
|
In Chepang, a simple Future may be expressed by suffixing /-caʔ/ to the main verb as in the first example. This affix may also be used to express epistemic possibility, hence the double gloss in that example. The second and third examples illustrate the use of the suffix /-kheʔ/, in combination with tense/aspect suffixes. Caughley characterizes the difference between these examples as follows: for the second 'the action as a completed unit is about to occur', and for the third the action 'is about to begin'. The fourth example illustrates another immediate future. Caughley refers to /-dhaŋ/ as the 'Near Future Marker'. It combines with the suffix /-caʔ/.
|
Example:
|
|
|
goʔ -
call-
|
ceʔ -
FUT-
|
na -
2-
|
ŋ
1.EXCL
|
|
|
| I will/may call you |
|
|
|
|
mak -
devour-
|
kheʔ -
IMMED-
|
ʔa -
PST-
|
thəy
GOAL
|
|
|
| A tiger is about to devour him |
|
|
kim -
house-
|
taŋ
ALLATIVE
|
|
dah -
arrive-
|
kheʔ -
IMMED-
|
naʔ
NONPST
|
|
|
| He is about to arrive at the house |
|
|
ŋa -
1.SG-
|
ʔi -
AGR-
|
dhaŋ
IMMEDFUT
|
|
yo -
look-
|
dhaŋ -
IMMEDFUT-
|
ca -
FUT-
|
ŋʔ
1.EXCL
|
|
|
| 'I am about to look/I will look now |
|
|
| Language: |
Chepang |
| Source: |
Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca (1994:245-246),Caughley (1982) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AbsolutePastTense
|
Definition:
| AbsolutePastTense locates the situation in question prior to
the present moment (Comrie 1985: 41).
|
Comment:
|
Agaw reportedly has a past/non-past binary tense system. Hetzron reports that for the main forms of Agaw verbs, there are combinations of two tenses and two aspects. In Hetzron's description, the two tenses are called Imperfect (used for present and future expressions) and Perfect (for past expressions). The two aspects are Definite and Indefinite. The first example is what he calls the Imperfect Definite (with a Nonpast tense). The second is the Imperfect Indefinite (also Nonpast). The third example is the Perfect Definite (a Past). The fourth is the Perfect Indefinite (also Past). The Imperfect Indefinite and the Perfect Definite are the most frequent combinations.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
| He is studying/He will study (uncertain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He studied (and still is)/He studied (uncertain) |
|
|
| Language: |
Agaw, Western |
| Source: |
Hetzron (1969:12-13) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AbsolutePresentTense
|
Definition:
| AbsolutePresentTense locates the situation in question at
the present moment, though the situation rarely coincides exactly with the
present moment (Comrie 1985: 37).
|
Comment:
|
Yup'ik appears to have a grammaticalized 4-way Tense distinction. Mithun includes discussion of the variable amount of time subsumed by the Yup'ik Present Tense form in the first example. Depending on the discourse situation, the present tense can cover anywhere from a time shortly before the utterance, to a day or so afterwards. The span of time covered has less to do with objective time than it does with the immediate consciousness of a speaker/hearer with regards to the experience being described. The second and third examples illustrate Immediate Future and Simple Future in the language
|
Example:
|
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AbsoluteRelativeTense
|
Definition:
| AbsoluteRelativeTense locates the event in question in
relation to a temporal reference point that, in turn, is referred to in
relation to the moment of utterance; the reference point and the moment of
utterance are not identical (Comrie 1985: 64-65).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AbsoluteTense
|
Definition:
| AbsoluteTenseValue is the set of all values associated with
the grammatical encoding of an event's location in time where the moment of
utterance is the deictic center (Comrie 1985: 36).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AbsolutiveCase
|
Definition:
| AbsolutiveCase in ergative-absolutive languages mark referents that would generally be the subjects of intransitive verbs or the objects of transitive verbs in the translational equivalents of nominative-accusative languages (Anderson 1985: 181; Crystal 1985: 1; Andrews and Avery 1985: 138).
|
Comment:
|
Blake uses the gloss NOM rather than ABS, a tradition among Australianists. Note in the examples above that the subject of the intransitive verb in the first example patterns after the object of the transitive verb in the second exa
mple.
|
Example:
|
|
|
w -
M-
|
eikér -
run-
|
ula
PRES
|
|
|
| The boy runs |
|
|
| Language: |
Avar |
| Source: |
Blake (2001:121),Ebeling (1966:77) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Abstract
|
Definition:
| Properties or qualities as distinguished from any particular
embodiment of the properties/qualities in a physical medium. Instances of
Abstract can be said to exist in the same sense as mathematical objects
such as sets and relations, but they cannot exist at a particular place and
time without some physical encoding or embodiment.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AccusativeCase
|
Definition:
| AccusativeCase in nominative-accusative languages marks certain syntactic functions, usually direct objects (Hartmann and Stork 1972: 3,156; Crystal 1980: 11,246; Andrews and Avery 1985: 75; Anderson; 1985: 181; Mish et al. 1990: 50).
|
Comment:
|
Here the nominative is zero-marked. Also, in this language nonspecific objects do not take the accusative case.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
| The director showed the letter to Hasan |
|
|
| Language: |
Turkish |
| Source: |
Blake (2001:87, 119),Comrie (1989:132-6, 175-6),Comrie (1976) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AdessiveCase
|
Definition:
| AdessiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it
marks is the location near/at which another referent exists. It has the
meaning of 'at' or 'near' (Crystal 1997: 8).
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Finnish |
| Source: |
Kiparsky (2001:316) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Adjectivalization
|
Definition:
| An adjectivalization is a partOfSpeech whose members differ grammatically from adjectives but which functions as them (Crystal 1997:260; Mish et al. 1990:801).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Adjective
|
Definition:
| An adjective is a part of speech whose members modify nouns. An adjective specifies the attributes of a noun referent. Note: this is one case among many. Adjectives are a class of modifiers (Crystal 1997:8; Mish et al. 1990:56; Payne 1997:63).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Adposition
|
Definition:
| An adposition is a part of speech whose members are of a closed set and occur before or after a complement composed of a noun phrase, noun, pronoun, or clause that functions as a noun phrase and forms a single structure with the complement to express its grammatical and semantic relation to another unit within a clause (Comrie 1989:91; Crystal 1997: 305; Mish et al. 1990:929; Payne 1997:86).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Adverb
|
Definition:
| An adverb, narrowly defined, is a part of speech whose members modify verbs for such categories as time, manner, place, or direction. An adverb, broadly defined, is is a part of speech whose members modify any constituent class of words other than nouns, such as verbs, adjectives, adverbs, phrases, clauses, or sentences. Under this definition, the possible type of modification depends on the class of the constituent being modified (Crystal 1997:11; Mish et al. 1990:59; Payne 1997:69).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AdversativeCase
|
Definition:
| AdversativeCase expresses an antithetical circumstance. Adversative meaning can be expressed in several grammatical ways, such as through a conjunction (but), adverbial (however, nevertheless, yet, in spite of that, on the other hand), or preposition (despite, except, apart from, notwithstanding) (Crystal 1997: 11).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AllativeCase
|
Definition:
| AllativeCase expresses motion to or toward the referent of the noun it marks (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 6,9,216; Lyons 1968: 299; Crystal 1985: 1213; Gove, et al. 1966: 55,2359).
|
Comment:
|
Lake Miwok has ten case enclitics, illustrated in the examples. In the vocative example, the gram marked as VOC is specific to 'mother'. Other kinship terms have their own special vocative forms.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| A flea is sitting on your forehead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He's standing in front of the king |
|
|
|
|
| He brought them to the king |
|
|
|
|
| The cat came out of there |
|
|
kaʔáppi -
father-
|
ni
COMIT
|
|
|
| I am walking with my father |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Miwok, Lake |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:204-6),Callaghan (1963) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Animate
|
Definition:
| One of the two grammatical genders, or classes of nouns, the other being inanimate. Membership in the animate grammatical class is largely based on meanings, in that living things, including humans, animals, spirits, trees, and most plants are included in the animate class of nouns (Valentine 2001: 114).
|
Example:
|
|
|
mEtEg#O -
tree-
|
g
ANIM-
PL
|
|
|
| trees |
|
|
mEtEg#O -
tree-
|
s
DIM-
INANIM
|
|
|
| stick |
|
|
mEtEg#O -
tree-
|
s -
DIM-
|
g
INANIM-
PL
|
|
|
| sticks |
|
|
| Language: |
Potawatomi |
| Source: |
Buszard-Welcher (unpublished field notes) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Article
|
Definition:
| An article is a member of a small class of determiners that identify a noun's definite or indefinite reference, and new or given status (Crystal 1997:26; Mish et al. 1990:105).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AspectValue
|
Definition:
| AspectValue is the class of values that may be associated with the feature instance 'aspect'. AspectValue is the class of all apsect types found in language. Aspect is the grammatical encoding of various characteristics of the event referred to in an utterance. Aspect does not form a semantically contiguous class (Comrie 1976; Bybee 1985; Sasse 2002).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Assumptive
|
Definition:
| Assumptive encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression through (possibly) unsound inference procedure. That is, it is at least reasonalbe (Palmer 2001: 6-8).
|
Comment:
|
Compare the first example, illustrating a Deductive Mood form, to the second example illustrating an Assumptive Mood form.
|
Example:
|
|
|
apé -
play-
|
yi
3.SG.PST-
DEDUCT
|
|
|
| He played soccer (I have seen evidence that he played, but I did not see him play) |
|
|
|
|
apé -
play-
|
hīyi
3.SG.PST-
ASSUMP
|
|
|
| He played soccer (I assume, but I have seen no evidence of this) |
|
|
| Language: |
Tuyuca |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:36),Barnes (1984),Malone (1988) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Attribute
|
Definition:
| Qualities which we cannot or choose not to reify into
subclasses of Object.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AuditoryEvidential
|
Definition:
| AuditoryEvidential encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression through direct auditory experience; they heard it. This does not include spoken reported accounts, but only direct sensory evdience, such as the situation of 'hearing a tree fall' (Palmer 2001: 38).
|
Comment:
|
Double notation with the visual evidential gloss in the first example is meant to indicate a circumfix. The second illustrates an Auditory Evidential.
|
Example:
|
a -
VIS-
|
pe -
come-
|
re
VIS
|
|
|
| [I see] it coming. |
|
|
pe -
come-
|
ra -
CUST-
|
rakae
AUD
|
|
|
| [I hear] it coming. |
|
|
| Language: |
Fasu |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:38),Foley (1986) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
AversiveCase
|
Definition:
| Marks the noun whose referent is the object of avoidance; also called the evitative (Blake 1998: 154).
|
Example:
|
yanyi -
ghost-
|
ŋkuŋu
AVERS
|
|
|
|
| S/he is afraid of ghosts |
|
|
| Language: |
Kalkutung |
| Source: |
Blake (2001:154-155) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
BenefactiveCase
|
Definition:
| BenefactiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks receives the benefit of the situation expressed by the clause (Crystal 1980: 43; Gove, et al. 1966: 203).
|
Example:
|
ama -
mother-
|
rentzat
SG.BEN
|
|
|
d -
3.ABS-
|
it -
PRES-
|
u -
PL-
|
t
AUX2.1.SG.ERG
|
|
|
|
| I have bought some flowers for mother |
|
|
| Language: |
Basque |
| Source: |
Saltarelli (1988:156) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
BoundRoot
|
Definition:
| BoundRoot is the class of bound units whose members are
common to a set of derived or inflected units, if any, when all bound
units are removed. They are not further analyzable into meaningful
elements, being morphologically simple. Also, they designate the principle
portion of meaning of the unit to which it belongs (Crystal 1985:268;
Hartmann and Stork 1972:199; Pei and Gaynor 1954:187-188; Mish et al.
1990:1023; Matthews 1991:64).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
BoundStem
|
Definition:
| BoundStem is the class of units whose members are
decomposable into a root or roots and a derivational unit, and are only
expressed by bound forms in the language (Crystal 1985:287; Mish et al.
1990:1154).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
CaseValue
|
Definition:
| CaseValue is the class of values that may be associated with the feature instance 'case'. CaseValue is the class of all case types found in language. Case is a system of marking dependent nouns for the type of relationship (syntactic or semantic) they bear to some other element in the sentence, such as a verb, noun, pronoun, or adposition(Pei and Gaynor 1954: 35; Crystal 1980: 5354; Anderson 1985: 179180; Andrews 1985: 7172; Mish et al. 1990: 211; Kuno 1973: 45; Blake 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Categorical
|
Definition:
| Categorical encodes that fact that the speaker knows the expressed proposition to be true (Palmer 2001: 37, 68-69).
|
Comment:
|
The first example, with an assertion clitic, may be compared to the second with a categorical assertion clitic.
|
Example:
|
waŋa:y -
NEG-
|
ba: -
ASSERT-
|
na
3.ABS
|
|
|
|
| He didn't walk (again) |
|
|
guni:m -
mother-
|
baa -
ABS-
|
nu:
CATEGORIALASSERT-
2.OBL
|
|
balu -
die-
|
y -
COMM-
|
aga
IRREAL
|
|
|
| Your mother is bound to die |
|
|
| Language: |
Wangaaybuwan-ngiyambaa |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:83),Donaldson (1980) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
CausalCase
|
Definition:
| Used to mark the noun whose referent is the cause of some event, found in Archi (Kibrik 1998: 468).
|
Example:
|
piciri -
pituri-
|
t̪uŋu
CAUS
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I'm high on pituri |
|
|
| Language: |
Kalkutung |
| Source: |
Blake (1979:47) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Character
|
Definition:
| Character is the minimal orthographic unit.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Class
|
Definition:
| Classes differ from Sets in two important respects. First,
Classes are not assumed to be extensional. That is, distinct Classes might
well have exactly the same instances. Second, Classes typically have an
associated `condition' that determines the instances of the Class. So, for
example, the condition `human' determines the Class of Humans. Note that
some Classes might satisfy their own condition (e.g., the Class of Abstract
things is Abstract) and hence be instances of themselves.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Clause
|
Definition:
| A clause is a minimal unit including a predicate, all arguments of the predicate, and all modifiers of the predicate and the arguments.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Clitic
|
Definition:
| Clitic is the class of units which members exhibit syntactic
characteristics of a lexical unit, but show evidence of being
morphologically bound to another lexical unit, the host, by being
unstressed or subject to word-level phonological rules (Crystal 1980:64;
Hartmann and Stork 1972:38; Anderson 1985:158; Klavans 1982: xi-xiv,
74-76,83,93-95,100-101; Zwicky 1977:5).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
CloseFutureTense
|
Definition:
| CloseFutureTense, also called 'immediate future', locates
the situation in question shortly after the moment of utterance (Dahl
1985:121; Comrie 1985:94; Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994:
244-245).
|
Comment:
|
In Chepang, a simple Future may be expressed by suffixing /-caʔ/ to the main verb as in the first example. This affix may also be used to express epistemic possibility, hence the double gloss in that example. The second and third examples illustrate the use of the suffix /-kheʔ/, in combination with tense/aspect suffixes. Caughley characterizes the difference between these examples as follows: for the second 'the action as a completed unit is about to occur', and for the third the action 'is about to begin'. The fourth example illustrates another immediate future. Caughley refers to /-dhaŋ/ as the 'Near Future Marker'. It combines with the suffix /-caʔ/.
|
Example:
|
|
|
goʔ -
call-
|
ceʔ -
FUT-
|
na -
2-
|
ŋ
1.EXCL
|
|
|
| I will/may call you |
|
|
|
|
mak -
devour-
|
kheʔ -
IMMED-
|
ʔa -
PST-
|
thəy
GOAL
|
|
|
| A tiger is about to devour him |
|
|
kim -
house-
|
taŋ
ALLATIVE
|
|
dah -
arrive-
|
kheʔ -
IMMED-
|
naʔ
NONPST
|
|
|
| He is about to arrive at the house |
|
|
ŋa -
1.SG-
|
ʔi -
AGR-
|
dhaŋ
IMMEDFUT
|
|
yo -
look-
|
dhaŋ -
IMMEDFUT-
|
ca -
FUT-
|
ŋʔ
1.EXCL
|
|
|
| 'I am about to look/I will look now |
|
|
| Language: |
Chepang |
| Source: |
Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca (1994:245-246),Caughley (1982) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ClosedFeature
|
Definition:
| ClosedFeature is the set of features with a simple value,
e.g., the feature 'tense' which may have the feature 'past' (Maxwell,
Simons and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ClosedMorphoSyntacticFeature
|
Definition:
| ClosedMorphoSyntacticFeature identifies the particular
grammatical category to which a simple FeatureValue is assigned. It is the
first member of a FeatureSpecification. Any grammatical category, such as
'tense' or 'aspect', can be represented as a ClosedMorphoSyntacticFeature
in a given language. A set of Features forms an integral part of a
language's FeatureSystem. (Maxwell, Simons and Hayashi
2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ClosedSpecification
|
Definition:
| ClosedSpecification is a kind of FeatureSpecification whose
first element must be an instance of Feature and whose second element must
be an instance of FeatureValue (Maxwell, Simons, and Hayashi
2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComitativeCase
|
Definition:
| ComitativeCase expresses accompaniment. It carries the meaning 'with' or 'accompanied by' (Anderson, Stephen 1985: 186; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 42;Dixon, R. 1972: 12; Gove, et al. 1966: 455).
|
Comment:
|
Lake Miwok has ten case enclitics, illustrated in the examples. In the vocative example, the gram marked as VOC is specific to 'mother'. Other kinship terms have their own special vocative forms.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| A flea is sitting on your forehead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He's standing in front of the king |
|
|
|
|
| He brought them to the king |
|
|
|
|
| The cat came out of there |
|
|
kaʔáppi -
father-
|
ni
COMIT
|
|
|
| I am walking with my father |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Miwok, Lake |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:204-6),Callaghan (1963) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Commisive
|
Definition:
| Commisive encodes that the speaker promises or threatens to perform some action (Palmer 2001: 10, 72).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer notes that most languages do not have a specific grammatical form for Commisives. In Ngiyambaa it appears that the marker glossed COMM combined with the Irrealis marker is used epistemically for 'might' or 'likely' and deontically for authoritative 'shall'. Palmer also reports that Ngiyambaa has a different inflectional form for the obligative or 'purposive' mood.
|
Example:
|
waŋa:y -
NEG-
|
ndu -
2.NOM-
|
gal
PL
|
|
dhagurma -
cemetery-
|
gu
DAT
|
|
yana -
go-
|
y -
COMM-
|
aga
IRREAL
|
|
|
| You shall none of you go to the cemetery |
|
|
| Language: |
Wangaaybuwan-ngiyambaa |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:36),Donaldson (1980) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComparativeCase
|
Definition:
| ComparitiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks has some property to a lesser extent than that of the referent of some other noun; found in Archi (Kibrik 1998: 469) and in some Dravidian languages (Blake 1998: 155).
|
Example:
|
qɪinn -
bridge-
|
i -
OBL.SG-
|
Xur
COMPAR
|
|
|
| than a/the bridge |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1991:256) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
CompletiveAspect
|
Definition:
| CompletiveAspect, also called the egressive,
encodes the end portion of some event. In order to be a completive, the
case in question should be clearly differentiated in the grammar from an
ordinary perfective which also implies that the event is completed (Bybee,
Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 54; Payne 1997: 240; Dahl 1999:
33).
|
Comment:
|
The first example, with completive aspect, may be compared with the second example, which lacks completive aspect.
|
Example:
|
i -
1.SG-
|
vu -
paddle-
|
kia
COMPL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I paddled to Domove, and then cast my net. |
|
|
|
|
e -
1.SG-
|
keoi -
cast.net-
|
na
APPL
|
|
|
| I went fishing |
|
|
| Language: |
Warembori |
| Source: |
Donohue (1999a:65) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComplexFeature
|
Definition:
| ComplexFeature is the set of features which have complex
values, that is, which have a FeatureSpecification as its value (Maxwell,
Simons and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComplexLexicalUnit
|
Definition:
| ComplexLexicalUnit
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComplexMorphoSyntacticFeature
|
Definition:
| ComplexMorphoSyntacticFeature identifies the particular
grammatical category to which a FeatureSpecification is assigned. This
class is used to assign multiple values to a single feature, e.g.,
'agreement' (Maxwell, Simons and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComplexOrthWord
|
Definition:
| A ComplexOrthWord is made up of two or more
WrittenLinguisticExpressions.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ComplexSpecification
|
Definition:
| ComplexSpecification is a kind of FeatureSpecification whose
first element must be an instance of Feature and whose second element must
be an instance of FeatureStructure. This class gives a feature system its
recursive properites (Maxwell, Simons, and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Compound
|
Definition:
| Compound
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Connective
|
Definition:
| Also known as a conjunction, a Connective is a class of parts of speech whose members syntactically link words or larger constituents, and expresses a semantic relationship between them. A conjunction is positionally fixed relative to one or more of the elements related by it, thus distinguishing it from constituents such as English conjunctive adverbs (Crystal 1997:81; Mish et al. 1990:277-278).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ContablativeCase
|
Definition:
| ContablativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from near which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from near'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ContallativeCase
|
Definition:
| ContallativeCase expresses that something is moving toward the vicinity of the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'towards the vicinity of'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ContentBearingObject
|
Definition:
| Any SelfConnectedObject that expresses
information.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ConterminativeCase
|
Definition:
| ConterminativeCase expresses the notion of something moving into the vicinity of the referent of the noun it marks, but not through that region. It has the meaning 'moving into the vicinity of'.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ContlativeCase
|
Definition:
| ContlativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location in the vicinity of which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'in the vicinity of'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
CoordinatingConnective
|
Definition:
| A coordinating connective is a connective that links constituents without syntactically subordinating one to the other (Crystal 1997:93; Mish et al. 1990:288).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DativeCase
|
Definition:
| DativeCase marks 1) indirect objects (for languages in which they are held to exist) or 2) nouns having the role of recipient (as of things given), beneficiary of an action, or possessor of an item (Crystal 1980: 102; Gove, et al. 1966: 577).
|
Comment:
|
Here the nominative is zero-marked. Also, in this language nonspecific objects do not take the accusative case.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
| The director showed the letter to Hasan |
|
|
| Language: |
Turkish |
| Source: |
Blake (2001:87, 119),Comrie (1989:132-6, 175-6),Comrie (1976) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Deductive
|
Definition:
| Deductive encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression through sound inference procedure. That is, it is the only possible conclusion (Palmer 2001: 6-8).
|
Comment:
|
Compare the first example above illustrating the Deductive 'cha'-form to the second example illustrating the Speculative 'sica' form in this language.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| At that time the baptismal certificate must have been incomplete (deduced) |
|
|
yuyanacurca -
they.were.thinking-
|
sica
DEDUCT
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I suppose they were thinking he was a child (speculated) |
|
|
| Language: |
Inga |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:27-28),Levinsohn (1975) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DelativeCase
|
Definition:
| DelativeCase expresses motion downward from the referent of the noun it marks (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 53; Gove, et al. 1966: 595).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DerivationalUnit
|
Definition:
| DerivationalUnit is the class of sublexical units whose
members function to derive a new lexical unit from an existing one, by
systematically changing the meaning and possibly altering the partOfSpeech
feature of the Root or Stem it attaches to (Hartmann and Stork 1972:62;
Crystal 1985:89; Mish et al. 1990:342; Bybee 1985:81-82,
99).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Determiner
|
Definition:
| A Determiner is a partOfSpeech whose members belong to a class of noun modifiers and express the reference, including quantity, of a noun (Crystal 1997:112; Mish et al. 1990:346).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DirectEvidential
|
Definition:
| DirectEvidential, also called sensory, encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression by having direct sensory experience of some situation; this does not include hearing about it from someone else (Palmer 2001: 35-36).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer refers to the Direct Evidential as Sensory Evidential and the Indirect Evidential as the 'reported' or 'linguistic evidential'
|
Example:
|
ŋindu -
you-
|
gara
NOM-
SENSE
|
|
|
|
| One can see you were sick |
|
|
ŋindu -
you-
|
dhan
NOM-
LINGEVID
|
|
|
|
| You are said to have been sick |
|
|
| Language: |
Wangaaybuwan-ngiyambaa |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:36),Donaldson (1980) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DirectionalCase
|
Definition:
| Represents a dynamic spatial relation (involving movement) between two Objects.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Dubitative
|
Definition:
| Dubitative encodes a speakers doubt or uncertainty about a proposition (Palmer 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DynamicityAspect
|
Definition:
| DynamicityAspect refers to the degree to which an event is expressed as an on going process, i.e., as progressive or not (Bybee, Perkins and Pagliuca 1994: 127-139).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ElativeCase
|
Definition:
| ElativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location out of which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'out of' (Lyons 1968: 299; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 64; Crystal 1985: 106; Gove, et al. 1966: 730).
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Finnish |
| Source: |
Kiparsky (2001:316) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Enclitic
|
Definition:
| An enclitic is a clitic that is phonologically joined at
the end of a preceding lexical unit to form a single phonological unit
(Crystal 1980:64; Pei and Gaynor 1954:65; Mish et al.
1990:409).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Entity
|
Definition:
| The universal class of individuals. This is the root node of
the ontology.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
EquativeCase
|
Definition:
| EquativeCase expresses 'likeness of' or 'identity to' the referent of the noun it marks. It mean: 'as', 'like', and 'in the capacity of'; in some instances, it may have the meaning 'occurs in the manner typical of the referent' (Kibrik 1998: 469).
|
Example:
|
te -
they-
|
jamj
OBL.PL.ERG
|
|
|
|
za -
REFL.OBL.PL-
|
qɪdi
EQU
|
|
|
|
|
| They want us to sign in their fashion |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ErgativeCase
|
Definition:
| ErgativeCase in ergative-absolutive languages generally identifies the subject of transitive verbs in the translation equivalents of nominative-accusative Languages such as English (Crystal 1980: 134; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 78; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 67; Andrews and Avery 1985: 138).
|
Comment:
|
Blake uses the gloss NOM rather than ABS, a tradition among Australianists. Note in the examples above that the subject of the intransitive verb in the first example patterns after the object of the transitive verb in the second exa
mple.
|
Example:
|
|
|
w -
M-
|
eikér -
run-
|
ula
PRES
|
|
|
| The boy runs |
|
|
| Language: |
Avar |
| Source: |
Blake (2001:121),Ebeling (1966:77) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
EssiveCase
|
Definition:
| EssiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks
is the location at which another referent exists (Lyons 1968: 299,301;
Gove, et al. 1966: 778; Crystal 1985: 112; Blake 1994:=
154-5).
|
Comment:
|
Lake Miwok has ten case enclitics, illustrated in the examples. In the vocative example, the gram marked as VOC is specific to 'mother'. Other kinship terms have their own special vocative forms.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| A flea is sitting on your forehead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He's standing in front of the king |
|
|
|
|
| He brought them to the king |
|
|
|
|
| The cat came out of there |
|
|
kaʔáppi -
father-
|
ni
COMIT
|
|
|
| I am walking with my father |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Miwok, Lake |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:204-6),Callaghan (1963) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
EvaluativeValue
|
Definition:
| EvaluativeValue is the class of values that may be associated with the feature instance 'evaluative'. EvaluativeValue is the class of all evaluative types found in language.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Feature
|
Definition:
| Feature, also called a quality or a feature name, is the
class of attributes that may be associated with entities. Features have as
their values instances of FeatureValue. That is, specific features have
specific values associated with them, e.g., the feature 'tense' has 'past',
'present', ..., 'future' as values. In the broader domain, the class of
Feature can be thought of as the set of qualities associated with some
object in general, e.g., color, size, shape, etc. (Shieber 1986: 12;
G=C3=A4rdenfors 2000; Masolo et al. 2002).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FeatureConstraint
|
Definition:
| FeatureConstraint is the class of all lists, duples, which
contain as the first member a partOfSpeechValue and, as its second, a set
of Features. This essentially gives part of speech a priviledged status in
a FeatureSystem. That is, the part of speech determines which Features may
be associated with a particular linguistic unit.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FeatureSpecification
|
Definition:
| A FeatureSpecification is an ordered list, a duple, whose
first element must be an instance of Feature and whose second element is
either an instance of FeatureValue or FeatureStructure (Maxwell, Simons,
and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FeatureStructure
|
Definition:
| A FeatureStructure is a set of zero or more
FeatureSpecifications. A FeatureStructure is a kind of information
structure, a container or data structure, expressly to group qualities or
features of some object. In a grammatical feature system, a
FeatureStructure holds the grammatical information associated with some
linguistic unit. In a typed feature system, a FeatureStructure has an
associated type, usually a PartOfSpeechValue. (Shieber 1986; Maxwell,
Simons, and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FeatureSystem
|
Definition:
| FeatureSystem is the class of grammatical systems which uses
features and values to represent grammatical information. It can be assumed
that only one feature system exists per language data project. A
FeatureSystem consists of a set of FeatureValueAssociations, which is a set
of features and their allowable values, and a set of FeatureConstraints
(Maxwell, Simons, and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FeatureValue
|
Definition:
| FeatureValue is the class of values that may be associated
with instances of Feature. That is, specific features have specific feature
values associated with them, e.g., the feature 'tense' has 'past',
'present', ..., 'future' as values. In the broader domain, the class of
FeatureValue can be thought of as the set of qualia associated with some
feature in general, a point in cognitive space. E.g., red is a quale in
color space (Shieber 1986: 12; Maxwell, Simons, and Hayashi 2001;
G=C3=A4rdenfors 2000; Masolo et al. 2002).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FeatureValueAssociation
|
Definition:
| FeatureValueAssociation is the class of all lists, duples,
which contain as the first member a Feature and as the second a set of
FeatureValues.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FolkloreEvidential
|
Definition:
| FolkloreEvidential encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression through legend, folklore or some other established tradition (Palmer 2001: 40).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer refers to the folklore evidential as a general knowledge evidential. The first example, a Folklore Evidential, may be compared to the hearsay evidential in the second example. The hearsay evidential in this language appears to subsume Second and Thirdhand Evidentials. The third example illustrates the Inference Evidential.
|
Example:
|
čhéemul -
rain.fell-
|
ʔma
FOLK
|
|
|
| It rained (that's an established fact) |
|
|
čhéemul -
rain.fell-
|
ʔdo
HSY
|
|
|
| It rained (I was told) |
|
|
čhéemul -
rain.fell-
|
ʔka
INFEVID
|
|
|
| It rained (everything is wet) |
|
|
| Language: |
Pomo, Central |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:6),Mithun (1999) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FreeRoot
|
Definition:
| FreeRoot is the class of free units whose members are common
to a set of derived or inflected units, if any, when all bound units are
removed. They are not further analyzable into meaningful elements, being
morphologically simple. Also, they designate the principle portion of
meaning of the unit to which it belongs (Crystal 1985:268; Hartmann and
Stork 1972:199; Pei and Gaynor 1954:187-188; Mish et al. 1990:1023;
Matthews 1991:64).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FreeStem
|
Definition:
| FreeStem is the class of units whose members are
decomposable into a root or roots and a derivational unit. They are
expressed by the free forms of the language (Crystal 1985:287; Mish et al.
1990:1154).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FutureInFutureTense
|
Definition:
| FutureInFutureTense locates the situation in question in the
future, relative to a temporal reference point that itself is located in
the future relative to the moment of utterance.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FutureInPastTense
|
Definition:
| FutureInPastTense locates the situation in question in the
future, relative to a contextually determined temporal reference point that
itself must be located in the past relative to the moment of
utterance.
|
Comment:
|
Here the tense of the auxiliary 'to be' locates a a past or future reference point relative to which the main verb occurs. The first example may be understood as Past in Past, or Past Perfect. The second may be understood as Past in Future, or Future Perfect. The third example may be understood as Future in Past. Comrie calls this last 'Conditional'.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Maltese |
| Source: |
Comrie (1985:77) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FuturePerfectTense
|
Definition:
| FuturePerfectTense locates the situation in question before
a contextually determined temporal reference point that must be located in
the future relative to the moment of utterance (Comrie
1985:69-71).
|
Comment:
|
Here the tense of the auxiliary 'to be' locates a a past or future reference point relative to which the main verb occurs. The first example may be understood as Past in Past, or Past Perfect. The second may be understood as Past in Future, or Future Perfect. The third example may be understood as Future in Past. Comrie calls this last 'Conditional'.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Maltese |
| Source: |
Comrie (1985:77) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Gender
|
Definition:
| A grammatical category used for the analysis of word-classes displaying such contrasts as masculine/feminine/neuter, animate/inanimate, etc. (Crystal 1980: 164-165).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
GenderValue
|
Definition:
| GenderValue is the class of values that may be associated with the feature instance 'gender'. GenderValue is the class of all gender types found in language.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
GeneralAbilitive
|
Definition:
| GeneralAbilitive is a very frequently occurring modality which encodes that the agent is able to perform some action. The conditions are external to the agent (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 177; Palmer 2001: 76)
|
Comment:
|
The first two Lisu examples may be interpreted as General Abilitive Mood. The third illustrates Mental Abilitive Mood. The fourth illustrates Physical Abilitive Mood.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
tyè -
freedom.taboo-
|
a̪
DEC
|
|
|
| It is not taboo for Asa to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bala -
no.hindrance-
|
a̪
DEC
|
|
|
| Asa is free to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kwú -
mentally.able-
|
a̪
DEC
|
|
|
| Asa is able (knows how) to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
| Asa is physically able to hoe fields |
|
|
| Language: |
Lisu |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:77),Hope (1974) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
GenitiveCase
|
Definition:
| GenitiveCase is used to mark the noun whose referent is the possessor of the referent of another noun (Crystal 1980: 161; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 9495,180; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 82,172; Anderson 1985: 185; Mish et al. 1990: 511; Fleming 1988: 10).
|
Comment:
|
Lake Miwok has ten case enclitics, illustrated in the examples. In the vocative example, the gram marked as VOC is specific to 'mother'. Other kinship terms have their own special vocative forms.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| A flea is sitting on your forehead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He's standing in front of the king |
|
|
|
|
| He brought them to the king |
|
|
|
|
| The cat came out of there |
|
|
kaʔáppi -
father-
|
ni
COMIT
|
|
|
| I am walking with my father |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Miwok, Lake |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:204-6),Callaghan (1963) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
GrammaticalCase
|
Definition:
| Subsumes the Cases that are assigned by the verb. These Cases often correspond to the SemanticRoles in the Sentence.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
HabitualAspect
|
Definition:
| HabitualAspect, also called the durative, encodes the situation where an event takes place over an extended period of time. This is, it refers to not just one event but many events of the same type. The occurrence of the events may be protracted indefinitely in time. If the event is a state, then the state is said to hold for some time. If the event is an achievement or an accomplishment, then it may occur again and again. The time interval which is relevant to the habitual is relatively longer than in the case of the iterative (Comrie 1976: 28; Bybee 1985: 142; Payne 1997: 241; Dahl 1999: 32).
|
Example:
|
|
|
| He/she eats rice habitually |
|
|
|
|
| He/She repeatedly ate rice |
|
|
| Language: |
Ewe |
| Source: |
Payne (1997:242) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
HesternalPastTense
|
Definition:
| HesternalPastTense locates the situation in question
somewhere in the span beginning with the period defined culturally as
'yesterday' and extends back through some period that is considered
nonremote (Comrie 1985:87-88; Dahl 1985:126).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
HodiernalFutureTense
|
Definition:
| HodiernalFutureTense locates the situation in question after
the moment of utterance within the span culturally defined as 'today'
(Comrie 1985: 86; Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 247).
|
Comment:
|
The affix kũ- in the first example may be used to mark either Hodiernal Past or Hodiernal Future depending on what aspect markers co-occur with it in the verb. Also, in the examples above, the final vowel of each verb is phonological, hence there is no correspondent for it in the interlinear gloss.
|
Example:
|
|
|
a -
2.SG-
|
kũ -
HODFUT-
|
nyu -
drink
|
a
|
|
|
|
| Kamau will drink porridge (within the day) |
|
|
|
|
a -
2.SG-
|
rĩĩ -
CLOSEFUT-
|
nyu -
drink
|
a
|
|
|
|
| Kamau will drink porridge (within the next few days) |
|
|
|
|
a -
2.SG-
|
rĩĩ -
REMFUT-
|
nyu -
drink
|
a
|
|
|
|
| Kamau will drink porridge (sometime beyond a few days from now) |
|
|
| Language: |
Gikuyu |
| Source: |
Mugane (1997) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
HodiernalPastTense
|
Definition:
| HodiernalPastTense locates the situation in question before
the moment of utterance within the span culturally defined as 'today'
(Comrie 1985:87; Dahl 1985:125-126)
|
Comment:
|
Bybee, et al divide past tense systems into those that refer to daily cycles and those that do not. Typically, languages with past tenses that refer to a daily cycle will have tense that specifies 'today' and all others will refer to spans of time prior to 'today' (Bybee, et al 1994:99, Dahl 1985:125; Comrie 1985:93). Cocama is such a language. The examples above illustrate its three-way system of remoteness distinctions in the past tense.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| I went to town a long time ago |
|
|
|
|
tutsu -
go-
|
icuá
PREHODPST
|
|
|
| I went to town yesterday/a few days ago |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Cocama-cocamilla |
| Source: |
Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca (1994:98-99),Faust (1978) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
IllativeCase
|
Definition:
| IllativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location into which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'into' (Lyons 1968: 299; Gove, et al. 1966: 1126; Crystal 1985: 152).
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ImmediatePastTense
|
Definition:
| ImmediatePastTense locates the situation in question at a
time considered very recent in relation to the moment of utterance (Comrie
1985: 87).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ImperfectiveAspect
|
Definition:
| ImperfectiveAspect encodes the internal temporal structure of an event from within. It indicates that the event is a process without emphasizing its end points, although there may be the entailment that the event has a starting/end point (Comrie 1976: 24; Dahl 1999: 33).
|
Comment:
|
The first of the examples illustrates imperfective aspect and may be compared with the second example, which illustrates perfective aspect.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| he was going there (he was on the way) |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Marathi |
| Source: |
Bhat (1999:46),Bernsten and Nimbkar (1982) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InablativeCase
|
Definition:
| InablativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from within which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from within'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InallativeCase
|
Definition:
| InallativeCase expresses that something is moving toward the region that is inside the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'towards in(side)'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InceptiveAspect
|
Definition:
| InceptiveAspect, also called the ingressive,
encodes the beginning portion of some event (Bybee 1985: 147, 149; Payne
1997: 240).
|
Comment:
|
The first example , with inceptive aspect, may be compared with the second example, which lacks inceptive aspect. In these examples, the inceptive is formed via affixation
|
Example:
|
wetgawə -
speak-
|
ŋŋo -
INCEPT-
|
k
INF
|
|
|
| to begin speaking |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Chukot |
| Source: |
Muravyova (1998:537) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Indicative
|
Definition:
| Indicative
|
Comment:
|
The first example above, illustrating Indicative mood, may be compared with the second, which illustrates Subjunctive mood. Here, the subjunctive is used to express doubt about a proposition.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
aprende
learn-
3.SG.PRES.INDIC
|
|
|
| I believe that he is learning |
|
|
|
|
|
aprende
learn-
3.SG.PRES.INDIC
|
|
|
| I doubt that he is learning |
|
|
| Language: |
Spanish |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:5),Klein (1975) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
IndirectEvidential
|
Definition:
| IndirectEvidential, also called reported, encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression from a source other than by experiencing the situation directly (Palmer 2001: 40).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer refers to the Direct Evidential as Sensory Evidential and the Indirect Evidential as the 'reported' or 'linguistic evidential'
|
Example:
|
ŋindu -
you-
|
gara
NOM-
SENSE
|
|
|
|
| One can see you were sick |
|
|
ŋindu -
you-
|
dhan
NOM-
LINGEVID
|
|
|
|
| You are said to have been sick |
|
|
| Language: |
Wangaaybuwan-ngiyambaa |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:36),Donaldson (1980) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InessiveCase
|
Definition:
| InessiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it
marks is the location within which another referent exists. It has the
meaning of 'within' or 'inside' (Lyons 1968: 299; Gove, et al. 1966: 1156;
Crystal 1985: 156). X in Y.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InferenceEvidential
|
Definition:
| InferenceEvidential encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression through some kind of internal inference procedure, e.g., deduction, abduction, induction (Palmer 2001: 6-8).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer refers to the folklore evidential as a general knowledge evidential. The first example, a Folklore Evidential, may be compared to the hearsay evidential in the second example. The hearsay evidential in this language appears to subsume Second and Thirdhand Evidentials. The third example illustrates the Inference Evidential.
|
Example:
|
čhéemul -
rain.fell-
|
ʔma
FOLK
|
|
|
| It rained (that's an established fact) |
|
|
čhéemul -
rain.fell-
|
ʔdo
HSY
|
|
|
| It rained (I was told) |
|
|
čhéemul -
rain.fell-
|
ʔka
INFEVID
|
|
|
| It rained (everything is wet) |
|
|
| Language: |
Pomo, Central |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:6),Mithun (1999) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InflectionalUnit
|
Definition:
| InflectionalUnit is the class of sublexical unit whose
members designate such grammatical categories as tense, aspect, mood etc.
The various forms of an InflectionalUnit plus the stem forms a grammatical
paradigm and express a grammatical contrast that is obligatory for its
stem's part of speech in some given grammatical context. An
InflectionalUnit does not alter the partOfSpeech feature of the Root or
Stem it attaches to. It is typically located farther from its Root than a
derivational unit and produces a predictable, nonidiosyncratic change of
meaning (Crystal 1980:184; Hartmann and Stork 1972:112; Mish et al.
1990:620; Bybee 1985:2, 99).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InstrumentalCase
|
Definition:
| InstrumentalCase indicates that the referent of the noun it marks is the means of the accomplishment of the action expressed by the clause (Crystal 1980: 187; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 114; Mish et al. 1990: 627).
|
Comment:
|
Lake Miwok has ten case enclitics, illustrated in the examples. In the vocative example, the gram marked as VOC is specific to 'mother'. Other kinship terms have their own special vocative forms.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| A flea is sitting on your forehead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He's standing in front of the king |
|
|
|
|
| He brought them to the king |
|
|
|
|
| The cat came out of there |
|
|
kaʔáppi -
father-
|
ni
COMIT
|
|
|
| I am walking with my father |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Miwok, Lake |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:204-6),Callaghan (1963) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InterablativeCase
|
Definition:
| InterablativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from between which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from inbetween'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InterallativeCase
|
Definition:
| InterallativeCase expresses that something is moving toward the region that is in the middle of the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'towards the middle of'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InteressiveCase
|
Definition:
| InteressiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it
marks is the location between which another referent exists. It has the
meaning of 'between'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InterlativeCase
|
Definition:
| InterlativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location between which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'to the middle of'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InterminativeCase
|
Definition:
| 'into in(side of)'.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InternalAttribute
|
Definition:
| Any Attribute of an Entity that is an internal property of
the Entity, e.g. its shape, its color, its fragility, etc.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InterterminativeCase
|
Definition:
| InterterminativeCase expresses the notion of something moving into the middle of the referent of the noun it marks, but not through it. It has the meaning 'into the middle of'.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
IntertranslativeCase
|
Definition:
| IntertranslativeCase expresses the notion of something moving along a trajectory between the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'along the in between'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
IntranslativeCase
|
Definition:
| IntranslativeCase expresses the notion of something moving through the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'along through'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Irrealis
|
Definition:
| Irrealis
|
Comment:
|
The first example, illustrating Realis mood, may be compared with the second, which illustrates Irrealis mood.
|
Example:
|
|
|
bu -
SIM-
|
busal -
run.out-
|
en
3.SG.DS.REALIS
|
|
|
|
|
| They killed the pig as it ran out. |
|
|
|
|
bu -
SIM-
|
busal -
run.out-
|
eb
3.SG.DS.IRREAL
|
|
|
qo -
hit-
|
qag -
3.PL.FUT
|
an
|
|
|
| They will kill the pig as it runs out |
|
|
| Language: |
Amele |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:5),Roberts (1990) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
IterativeAspect
|
Definition:
| IterativeAspect, also called repetitives, encodes a number of events of the same type that are repeated on a particular occasion. The time interval which is relevant to the iterative is relatively shorter than in the case of the habitual (Bybee 1985: 150; Bybee, Perkins and Pagliuca 1994: 127).
|
Example:
|
|
|
| He/she eats rice habitually |
|
|
|
|
| He/She repeatedly ate rice |
|
|
| Language: |
Ewe |
| Source: |
Payne (1997:242) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
LativeCase
|
Definition:
| LativeCase expresses 'motion up to the location of,' or 'as
far as' the referent of the noun it marks (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 121; Gove,
et al. 1966: 1277).
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
jeelara
GENDER-
ascend-
WITNESSEDPST
|
|
|
|
joessara
GENDER-
descend-
WITNESSEDPST
|
|
|
| Malika climbed up and down the mountain |
|
|
| Language: |
Chechen |
| Source: |
Good (2003:23) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
LexicalUnit
|
Definition:
| LexicalUnit is the class of morphosyntactic units which are
expressed as individual units, or words, in a language. They are
constituents at the Phrase level and above. They are sometimes identifiable
according to such criteria as: (1) they are the minimal possible units in a
reply; (2) their phonological expressions have features such as a regular
stress pattern, and phonological changes conditioned by or blocked at Word
boundaries; (3) they are the largest units resistant to insertion of new
constituents within their boundaries; or (4) they are the smallest
constituents that can be moved within a Sentence without making the
Sentence ungrammatical (Hartmann and Stork 1972: 256; Crystal 1980: 168,
383, 384; Cruse 1986: 3536; Mish et al. 1990: 1358; Pike and Pike 1982:
462).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
LinguisticUnit
|
Definition:
| The class of entities is meant to be a container for mental
linguistic units of all kinds, including discourse, morphosyntactic,
phonological and semantic.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
List
|
Definition:
| Every List is a particular ordered n-tuple of
items. Generally speaking, Lists are created by means of the ListFn
Function, which takes any number of items as arguments and returns a
List with the items in the same order. Anything, including other
Lists, may be an item in a List. Note too that Lists are
extensional - two lists that have the same items in the same order are
identical. Note too that a List may contain no items. In that case,
the List is the NullList.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
MainClause
|
Definition:
| A main clause is an independent clause that can stand on its own as a sentence. If a sentence contains any embedded clauses, the main clause is understood as the matrix plus the embedded clauses. In the sentence 'John thinks that Mary is sick', 'John thinks that Mary is sick' is the main clause (Crystal 2001: 231).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
MalefactiveCase
|
Definition:
| Opposite of BenefactiveCase; used when the marked noun is negatively affected in the clause.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
MentalAbilitive
|
Definition:
| MentalAbilitive encodes an internal condition of ability, whereby the agent has the mental capacity to perform some action (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 192; Palmer 2001: 77)
|
Comment:
|
The first two Lisu examples may be interpreted as General Abilitive Mood. The third illustrates Mental Abilitive Mood. The fourth illustrates Physical Abilitive Mood.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
tyè -
freedom.taboo-
|
a̪
DEC
|
|
|
| It is not taboo for Asa to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bala -
no.hindrance-
|
a̪
DEC
|
|
|
| Asa is free to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kwú -
mentally.able-
|
a̪
DEC
|
|
|
| Asa is able (knows how) to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
| Asa is physically able to hoe fields |
|
|
| Language: |
Lisu |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:77),Hope (1974) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ModalityValue
|
Definition:
| ModalityValue is the class of values that may be associated with the feature instance 'modality'. ModalityValue is the class of all modality types found in language. Modality is the encoding of the speaker's attitudes and opinions about the expressed proposition. Modality is concerned with the encoding of the truth status of the expressed proposition as well as the propositional attitudes such as fears, wants and desires. Evidentiality is also closely related and is often part of the formal mood system of a language. A formal distinction is often made between modal and mood systems in the grammar. However, here they are conflated as Modality (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 176; Palmer 2001: 1).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
MorphoSyntacticFeatureValue
|
Definition:
| MorphoSyntacticFeatureValue is the class of values that may
be associated with instances of MorphoSyntacticFeature. In a FeatureSystem,
these dictate the formal properties of the grammar and may or may not be
true semantically. A set of FeatureValues forms an integral part of a
language's FeatureSystem (Pollard and Sag 1994; Maxwell, Simons, and
Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
MorphoSyntacticUnit
|
Definition:
| The class of entities which may be construed as the elements
of a language. Such units are meant to serve as ontological containers for
mental objects or representations. In some theories, these may correspond
to the notion of a morphemes and constructions. In a feature system, these
elements carry MorphoSyntacticFeatures.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
NominalParticle
|
Definition:
| A nominal particle is a member of a closed class of particles that co-occur with nouns.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Nominalization
|
Definition:
| A nominal is a partOfSpeech whose members differ grammatically from a substantive but which functions as one (Crystal 1997:260; Mish et al. 1990:801).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
NominativeCase
|
Definition:
| NominativeCase identifies clause subjects in nominative-accusative languages. It is usually the unmarked case. Nouns used in isolation often have this case (Crystal 1980: 242; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 147; Mish et al. 1990: 801; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 224).
|
Comment:
|
Here the nominative is zero-marked. Also, in this language nonspecific objects do not take the accusative case.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
| The director showed the letter to Hasan |
|
|
| Language: |
Turkish |
| Source: |
Blake (2001:87, 119),Comrie (1989:132-6, 175-6),Comrie (1976) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
NonFutureTense
|
Definition:
| NonFutureTense locates the situation in question at or
before the moment of utterance, and contrasts with a FutureTense (Comrie
1985: 49).
|
Comment:
|
These examples illustrate a reportedly binary, future/non-future tense system. Interlinear glosses are constructed here based on Haiman's discussion of verb stem alternations and their structures. Haiman reports that in Hua, Non-future tense is indicated by the lack of an auxiliary. Future tense is expressed with a variety of auxiliaries. The first example illustrates the Simple Indicative Future. The second is a Non-future tense with Interrogative Mood.
|
Example:
|
hu -
do-
|
gu -
do-
|
e
FUT-
IND.SG
|
|
|
| I will do |
|
|
hu -
do-
|
ve
1-
INTERROGATIVE.SG
|
|
|
| Did I do? |
|
|
| Language: |
Yagaria |
| Source: |
Haiman (1980:47, 140-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
NonGrammaticalCase
|
Definition:
| Subsumes the Cases that are assigned by the verb. These Cases often correspond to the SemanticRoles in the Sentence.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
NonPastTense
|
Definition:
| NonPastTense locates the situation in question at or after
the moment of utterance, and contrasts with a past tense (Comrie
1985:48-49).
|
Comment:
|
Agaw reportedly has a past/non-past binary tense system. Hetzron reports that for the main forms of Agaw verbs, there are combinations of two tenses and two aspects. In Hetzron's description, the two tenses are called Imperfect (used for present and future expressions) and Perfect (for past expressions). The two aspects are Definite and Indefinite. The first example is what he calls the Imperfect Definite (with a Nonpast tense). The second is the Imperfect Indefinite (also Nonpast). The third example is the Perfect Definite (a Past). The fourth is the Perfect Indefinite (also Past). The Imperfect Indefinite and the Perfect Definite are the most frequent combinations.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
| He is studying/He will study (uncertain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He studied (and still is)/He studied (uncertain) |
|
|
| Language: |
Agaw, Western |
| Source: |
Hetzron (1969:12-13) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
NonProgressiveAspect
|
Definition:
| NonProgressiveAspect is essentially the opposite of ProgressiveAspect; it encodes a single event as a state or non-process. It is a controversial category, though there may be languages in which it contrasts witht he ProgressiveAspect (Comrie 1976: 32-35; Bybee, Perkins and Pagliuca 1994: 137-139).
|
Comment:
|
In English, the grammatically progressive form in the first of the examples and the nonprogressive form in the second example are not interchangeable. This is Comrie's motivation for having the category nonprogressive. By contrast, both of the Spanish examples may be understood to have progressive aspect, despite their grammatical differences.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| John is (in the process of) singing |
|
|
|
|
| John is (in the process of) singing or John (habitually) sings |
|
|
| Language: |
Spanish |
| Source: |
Comrie (1976:33) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
NonRecentPastTense
|
Definition:
| NonRecentPastTense locates the situation in question before
the range of a contrasting recent past tense. This category must be defined
relative to a RecentPastTense.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
NonRemotePastTense
|
Definition:
| NonRemotePastTense locates the situation in question not
more than a few days ago, in contrast to a RemotePastTense. This category
must be defined relative to a RemotePastTense.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
NonSpatialCase
|
Definition:
| This subsumes cases which are non-grammatical and non-spatial.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
NonVisualEvidential
|
Definition:
| NonVisualEvidential encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression directly in a way other than through visual experience; they heard it, smelled it, tasted it, ect. (Palmer 2001: 36, 57).
|
Comment:
|
The first example, with a visual evidential, may be compared to the second, with a nonvisual evidential.
|
Example:
|
|
|
apé -
play-
|
wi
3.SG.PST-
VIS
|
|
|
| He played soccer (I saw him play) |
|
|
|
|
apé -
play-
|
ti
3.SG.PST-
NONVIS
|
|
|
| He played soccer (I heard the game and him, but I didn't see it or him) |
|
|
| Language: |
Tuyuca |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:36),Barnes (1984),Malone (1988) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Noun
|
Definition:
| A noun is a broad classification of parts of speech which include substantives and nominals (Crystal 1997:371; Mish et al. 1990:1176).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
NumberValue
|
Definition:
| NumberValue is the class of values that may be associated with the feature instance 'number'. NumberValue is the class of all grammatical number types found in language. Number is a grammatical category often found on nouns, pronouns, and verb agreement that expresses count distinctions--such as 'one' or 'more than one'. The count distinctions typically, but not always, correspond to the actual count of the referents of the marked noun or Pronoun (Crystal 1980: 245; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 155; Mish et al. 1990: 811).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Numeral
|
Definition:
| A numeral is a partOfSpeech whose members function most typically as adjectives or pronouns and express a number, or relation to the number, such as one of the following: quantity, sequence, frequency, fraction (Hartmann and Stork 1972:155; Pei and Gaynor 1954:149).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Object
|
Definition:
| Corresponds roughly to the class of ordinary objects.
Examples include normal physical objects, geographical regions, and
locations of Processes, the complement of Objects in the Physical class.
In a 4D ontology, an Object is something whose spatiotemporal extent is
thought of as dividing into spatial parts roughly parallel to the
time-axis.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Obligative
|
Definition:
| Obligative is a very common modal category and encodes that the subject is required to perform the action expressed by the predicate (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 177; Palmer 2001: 71).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer notes that some grammars may refer to the Obligative Mood as 'Purposive'. The first example expressing Obligative Mood may be compared with the second example illustrating Permissive Mood.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| It is obligatory for Asa to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
| It is acceptable for Asa to hoe fields |
|
|
| Language: |
Lisu |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:72),Hope (1974) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Optative
|
Definition:
| Optative encodes that the speaker wishes or hopes that the expressed proposition be the case (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 179; Palmer 2001: 204).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer notes that the Optative or 'wishing' mood tends to be grammaticalized in subjunctive forms. See the Cheyenne example for an illustration of distinct subjunctive and optative forms.
|
Example:
|
njuutaa
be.long-
2.SG.SUBJ
|
|
|
|
| May you live long! |
|
|
| Language: |
Fuuta Jalon |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:132),Arnott (1970) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
OrthAffix
|
Definition:
| An OrthAffix is a OrthPart that is joined before, after,
around, or within an OrthRoot or OrthStem (Crystal 1980: 17; Hartmann and
Stork 1972: 6; Mish et al. 1990: 62).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
OrthCircumfix
|
Definition:
| An OrthCircumfix is an OrthAffix that is attached around a
OrthRoot or OrthStem
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
OrthCompound
|
Definition:
| An OrthCompound is an expression made up of two or more
OrthRoots.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
OrthInfix
|
Definition:
| An OrthInfix is an OrthAffix that is inserted within a
OrthRoot (Hartmann and Stork 1972: 111).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
OrthPart
|
Definition:
| OrthPart is the subclass of=20written expressions whose
members are not orthographically independent, that is, they cannot stand
alone as words but compose to form words. Note that an OrthPart is not the
same as a single character. Although, some OrthParts are
characters.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
OrthPhrase
|
Definition:
| An OrthPhrase realizes a PhraseUnit.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
OrthPrefix
|
Definition:
| An OrthPrefix is an OrthAffix that is joined before a
OrthRoot or OrthStem (Crystal 1980: 281; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 182; Mish
et al. 1990: 927).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
OrthRoot
|
Definition:
| Some expression is an OrthRoot if it realizes a
LinguisticUnit which is either a Bound or FreeRoot.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
OrthStem
|
Definition:
| An OrthStem realizes either a Boundor
FreeStem.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
OrthSuffix
|
Definition:
| A OrthSuffix is an OrthAffix that is attached to the end of
a OrthRoot or OrthStem (Crystal 1980: 340; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 226;
Mish et al. 1990: 1179).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
OrthWord
|
Definition:
| An OrthWord is the fundamental unit of an orthography,
usually set off by white space.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PartOfSpeechValue
|
Definition:
| PartOfSpeechValue is the value associated with partOfSpeech feature. PartOfSpeechValue is the class of all lexical types found in language. While a particular theory may not utilize the notion part of speech, it is useful as part of a FeatureSystem. The set of part of speech values for a particular language can be described based on how words behave in the syntax (Payne 1997: 33; Maxwell, Simons, and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Particle
|
Definition:
| A particle is a partOfSpeech whose members do not belong to one of the main classes of words, is invariable, and typically has grammatical or pragmatic meaning.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PartitiveCase
|
Definition:
| PartitiveCase expresses the partial nature of the referent of the noun it marks, as opposed to expressing the whole unit or class of which the referent is a part. This case may be found in items such as the following: existential clauses, nouns that are accompanied by numerals or units of measure, or predications of material from which something is made. It often has a meaning similar to the English word 'some' (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 161; Richards, Platt, and Weber 1985: 208; Quirk, et al. 1985: 249; Gove, et al. 1966: 1648; Sebeok 1946: 1214).
|
Comment:
|
Here the suffix marked as PART is the same suffix used to mark the Ablative case in Hungarian.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
sütemény -
pastry-
|
ből
PART
|
|
|
| S/he ate some of the pastry |
|
|
| Language: |
Hungarian |
| Source: |
Moravcsik (1978:261) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PerfectAspect
|
Definition:
| PerfectAspect indicates that the event is relevant in relation to some reference time. Thus, it encodes both a temporal and a discourse relation between two time points. It can contrast with the perfective (Comrie 1976: 52-65; Give001: 296).
|
Comment:
|
Comrie seems to suggest that Perfect should be a distinct aspectual category because in some cases an action is completed, but the state of affairs that obtains is ongoing.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| I have lost my penknife (and it is still lost) |
|
|
| Language: |
English |
| Source: |
Comrie (1976:52) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PerfectiveAspect
|
Definition:
| PerfectiveAspect, sometimes called the aorists, encodes the totality of some event, that is, the event viewed from outside, in its entirety as a whole. Because perfectives encode the entire event, the event is necessarily complete. A perfective may be used to encode a several events when they are to be viewed as a whole (Comrie 1976: 12, 18; Payne 1997: 239; Dahl 1999: 33)
|
Comment:
|
The first of the examples illustrates imperfective aspect and may be compared with the second example, which illustrates perfective aspect.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| he was going there (he was on the way) |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Marathi |
| Source: |
Bhat (1999:46),Bernsten and Nimbkar (1982) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PerlativeCase
|
Definition:
| PerlativeCase expresses that something moved 'through','across', or 'along' the referent of the noun that is marked (Blake 1998: 38, 203).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Permissive
|
Definition:
| Permissive encodes that the subject has permission to perform the action expressed by the predicate (Palmer 2001: 10, 71).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer notes that some grammars may refer to the Obligative Mood as 'Purposive'. The first example expressing Obligative Mood may be compared with the second example illustrating Permissive Mood.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| It is obligatory for Asa to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
| It is acceptable for Asa to hoe fields |
|
|
| Language: |
Lisu |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:72),Hope (1974) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PermutativeCase
|
Definition:
| PermutativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks takes part in some event instead of the referent of some other noun; it means roughly ' instead of'; found in Archi (Kibrik 1998: 469).
|
Example:
|
| Send your own son in place of my son |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:469) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PersonValue
|
Definition:
| PersonValue is the class of values that may be associated with the feature instance 'person'. PersonValue is the class of all grammatical person types found in language. Person indicates the number and nature of the participants in a situation. Usually a three-way contrast is found: first, second, and third person. Other formal distinctions in languages include: inclusive/exlusive, honorific/intimate, and male/female (Crystal 1997: 285).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PersonalPronoun
|
Definition:
| A personal pronoun is a pronoun that expresses a distinction of person deixis (Mish et al. 1990:878).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PhaseAspect
|
Definition:
| PhaseAspect encodes some portion of the event, the initial, final or core part (Bickel 1997: 116; Sasse 2002).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PhraseUnit
|
Definition:
| PhraseUnit
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Physical
|
Definition:
| An entity that has a location in space-time. Note that
locations are themselves understood to have a location in
space-time.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PhysicalAbilitive
|
Definition:
| PhysicalAbilitive encodes an internal condition of ability, whereby the agent has the physical capacity to perform some action (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 192; Palmer 2001: 77).
|
Comment:
|
The first two Lisu examples may be interpreted as General Abilitive Mood. The third illustrates Mental Abilitive Mood. The fourth illustrates Physical Abilitive Mood.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
tyè -
freedom.taboo-
|
a̪
DEC
|
|
|
| It is not taboo for Asa to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bala -
no.hindrance-
|
a̪
DEC
|
|
|
| Asa is free to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kwú -
mentally.able-
|
a̪
DEC
|
|
|
| Asa is able (knows how) to hoe fields |
|
|
|
|
| Asa is physically able to hoe fields |
|
|
| Language: |
Lisu |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:77),Hope (1974) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PolarityValue
|
Definition:
| PolarityValue is the class of values that may be associated with the feature instance 'polarity'. PolarityValue is the class of all polarity types found in language.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PositionalCase
|
Definition:
| Represents a static spatial relation between two Objects.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PossessedCase
|
Definition:
| PossessedCase is used to mark the noun whose referent is possessed by the referent of another noun.
|
Example:
|
|
|
g -
3.POSSD-
|
'm̓ásdi̓i
hand
|
|
|
| the boy's hand |
|
|
s -
1.POSSD-
|
'a̓masdi̓i
hand
|
|
|
| my hand |
|
|
| Language: |
Keres, Western |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:250),Miller (1965:148) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PossessorCase
|
Definition:
| PossessorCase is used to mark the noun whose referent is the possessor of the referent of another noun (Blake 1998: 149).
|
Example:
|
wóle -
whiteman-
|
k̓i
POSSV
|
|
|
|
| with whiteman's flour |
|
|
| Language: |
Maidu, Northwest |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:249),Shipley (1964:27, 31) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PostHodiernalFutureTense
|
Definition:
| PostHodiernalFutureTense locates the situation in question
after the span that is culturally defined as 'today' (Bybee, Perkins, and
Pagliuca 1994: 247).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PreHesternalPastTense
|
Definition:
| PreHesternalPastTense locates the situation in question
before that of an opposing hesternal past tense. This category must be
defined relative to a HesternalPastTense (Bybee, Perkins, Pagliuca 1994:
98).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PreHodiernalPastTense
|
Definition:
| PreHodiernalPastTense locates the situation in question
before that of a contrasting HodiernalPastTense. This category must be
defined relative to a HodiernalPastTense (Bybee, Perkins, Pagliuca 1994:
98).
|
Comment:
|
Bybee, et al divide past tense systems into those that refer to daily cycles and those that do not. Typically, languages with past tenses that refer to a daily cycle will have tense that specifies 'today' and all others will refer to spans of time prior to 'today' (Bybee, et al 1994:99, Dahl 1985:125; Comrie 1985:93). Cocama is such a language. The examples above illustrate its three-way system of remoteness distinctions in the past tense.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| I went to town a long time ago |
|
|
|
|
tutsu -
go-
|
icuá
PREHODPST
|
|
|
| I went to town yesterday/a few days ago |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Cocama-cocamilla |
| Source: |
Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca (1994:98-99),Faust (1978) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ProForm
|
Definition:
| A ProForm is a partOfSpeech whose members usually substitute for other constituents, including phrases, clauses, or sentences, and whose meaning is recoverable from the linguistic or extralinguistic context (Schachter 1985:24-25; Crystal 1997:310).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Process
|
Definition:
| Intuitively, the class of things that happen and have
temporal parts or stages. Examples include extended events like a football
match or a race, actions like Searching and Reading, and biological
processes. The formal definition is: anything that lasts for a time but is
not an Object. Note that a Process may have participants 'inside' it which
are Objects, such as the players in a football match. In a 4D ontology, a
Process is something whose spatiotemporal extent is thought of as dividing
into temporal stages roughly perpendicular to the time-axis.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Proclitic
|
Definition:
| A proclitic is a clitic that precedes the lexical unit to
which it is phonologically joined (Crystal 1980:64; Hartmann and Stork
1972:185; Pei and Gaynor 1954:176; Mish et al. 1990:938).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ProgressiveAspect
|
Definition:
| ProgressiveAspect, also called the continuative or the durative, encodes a single event as an ongoing process. Thus, states cannot generally be encoded with the progressive (Comrie 1976: 32-35; Bybee, Perkins and Pagliuca 1994: 127-139; Payne 1997: 240).
|
Comment:
|
The Progressive stem in the first example may be compared to the Transitional stem in the second. The Progressive is used for incomplete or ongoing actions or states, actions continued as one moves along, and inchoatives. The Transitional is used to indicate entrance into a state.
|
Example:
|
ghe -
PRFV-
|
le -
CL-
|
nustl
swell-
PROG
|
|
|
| It is swelling up |
|
|
Ø -
PRFV-
|
le -
CL-
|
noots
swell-
TRANSITIONAL
|
|
|
| It swelled up |
|
|
| Language: |
Koyukon |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:169),Axelrod (1993) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Pronoun
|
Definition:
| A Pronoun is a proForm which functions like a noun and substitutes for a noun or noun phrase (Crystal 1997:312; Mish et al. 1990:942).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ProprietiveCase
|
Definition:
| This case expresses the presence of the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning of the English verb 'have' (Blake 1994: 156).
|
Comment:
|
Blake reports that this case appears in lexicalized formations in many Australian languages.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Quantifier
|
Definition:
| A quantifier is a determiner that expresses a referent's definite or indefinite number or amount. A quantifier functions as a modifier of a noun, or a pronoun (Crystal 1997:317; Mish et al. 1990:963).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
QuantitativeAspect
|
Definition:
| QuantitativeAspect refers to the cardinality of the event which is represented by the predicate (de Groot 1995; Dahl 1999: 31; Sasse 2002: 227).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Realis
|
Definition:
| Realis
|
Comment:
|
The first example, illustrating Realis mood, may be compared with the second, which illustrates Irrealis mood.
|
Example:
|
|
|
bu -
SIM-
|
busal -
run.out-
|
en
3.SG.DS.REALIS
|
|
|
|
|
| They killed the pig as it ran out. |
|
|
|
|
bu -
SIM-
|
busal -
run.out-
|
eb
3.SG.DS.IRREAL
|
|
|
qo -
hit-
|
qag -
3.PL.FUT
|
an
|
|
|
| They will kill the pig as it runs out |
|
|
| Language: |
Amele |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:5),Roberts (1990) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
RecentPastTense
|
Definition:
| RecentPastTense locates the situation in question prior to
the present moment, but by culturally and situationally defined criteria,
usually within the span ranging from yesterday to a week or a few months
previous (Comrie 1985:87; Dahl 1985:121-122).
|
Comment:
|
Bybee, et al indicate that Inuit manifests a 2-way past distinction that makes no reference to daily cycles. The two subdivisions they reference are given in the second and third examples. The first example, with the affix glossed as PERF, illustrates a past that Fortescue claims is often understood as a general experiential past without any specified time. This might be analyzed as a Simple Past.
|
Example:
|
Nuum -
Nuuk-
|
miis -
be.in-
|
sima -
PERF-
|
vunga
1.S.INDIC
|
|
|
| I have been to Nuuk |
|
|
tuqu -
die-
|
riikatap -
REMPST-
|
puq
3.SG.INDIC
|
|
|
| He died long ago |
|
|
niri -
eat-
|
qqammir -
RECPST-
|
punga
1.SG.INDIC
|
|
|
| I ate recently |
|
|
| Language: |
Inuktitut, Eastern Canadian |
| Source: |
Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca (1994:99),Fortescue (1984:272-3) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Relation
|
Definition:
| The Class of relations. There are three kinds
of Relation: Predicate, Function, and List. Predicates and
Functions both denote sets of ordered n-tuples. The difference between
these two Classes is that Predicates cover formula-forming operators, while
Functions cover term-forming operators. A List, on the other hand, is a
particular ordered n-tuple.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
RelativeFutureTense
|
Definition:
| RelativeFutureTense locates the situation in question after
a contextually determined temporal reference point, regardless of the
latter's relation to the moment of utterance.
|
Comment:
|
Mithun cites this story as a case where the temporal point of reference is not the moment of utterance, but the 'narrative present', indicated by the absence of tense marking. What Mithun refers to as 'narrative present' may be considered a Relative Present. In this example, the narrative present is a moment that actually occurred in the past during an 1824 revolt. The Future and Past markings that occur later in the story are understood to be future and past relative to the narrative present, not the moment of the story-telling. In this story, the markers for Relative Future and Relative Past do not appear to differ from markers used in Absolute tense constructions. The point of reference has simply shifted.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| what they had done (PAST) to him |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| that a person had lied (PAST) badly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| from what he had suffered (PAST) |
|
|
|
|
| They laid him at the door of the Mission (NO TENSE MARKER) |
|
|
|
|
| so that the people would see (FUTURE) |
|
|
| Language: |
Chumash |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:160-2) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
RelativeNonFutureTense
|
Definition:
| RelativeNonFutureTense locates the situation in question
simultaneous to, or before, a contextually determined temporal reference
point, regardless of the latter's relation to the moment of
utterance.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
RelativeNonPastTense
|
Definition:
| RelativeNonPastTense locates the situation in question
simultaneous to, or after, a contextually determined temporal reference
point, regardless of the latter's relation to the moment of
utterance.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
RelativePastTense
|
Definition:
| RelativePastTense locates the situation in question before
that of a contextually determined temporal reference point (Comrie 1985:
104).
|
Comment:
|
Mithun cites this story as a case where the temporal point of reference is not the moment of utterance, but the 'narrative present', indicated by the absence of tense marking. What Mithun refers to as 'narrative present' may be considered a Relative Present. In this example, the narrative present is a moment that actually occurred in the past during an 1824 revolt. The Future and Past markings that occur later in the story are understood to be future and past relative to the narrative present, not the moment of the story-telling. In this story, the markers for Relative Future and Relative Past do not appear to differ from markers used in Absolute tense constructions. The point of reference has simply shifted.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| what they had done (PAST) to him |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| that a person had lied (PAST) badly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| from what he had suffered (PAST) |
|
|
|
|
| They laid him at the door of the Mission (NO TENSE MARKER) |
|
|
|
|
| so that the people would see (FUTURE) |
|
|
| Language: |
Chumash |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:160-2) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
RelativePresentTense
|
Definition:
| RelativePresentTense locates the situation in question
simultaneously with some contextually determined temporal reference
point.
|
Comment:
|
Mithun cites this story as a case where the temporal point of reference is not the moment of utterance, but the 'narrative present', indicated by the absence of tense marking. What Mithun refers to as 'narrative present' may be considered a Relative Present. In this example, the narrative present is a moment that actually occurred in the past during an 1824 revolt. The Future and Past markings that occur later in the story are understood to be future and past relative to the narrative present, not the moment of the story-telling. In this story, the markers for Relative Future and Relative Past do not appear to differ from markers used in Absolute tense constructions. The point of reference has simply shifted.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| what they had done (PAST) to him |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| that a person had lied (PAST) badly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| from what he had suffered (PAST) |
|
|
|
|
| They laid him at the door of the Mission (NO TENSE MARKER) |
|
|
|
|
| so that the people would see (FUTURE) |
|
|
| Language: |
Chumash |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:160-2) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
RelativeTense
|
Definition:
| RelativeTense locates the situation in question in relation
to a contextually determined temporal reference point, regardless of the
latter's temporal relation to the moment of utterance (Comrie 1985:
56).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
RelevanceAspect
|
Definition:
| RelevanceAspect encodes the degree to which some event is relevant in relation to some reference time (Give001: 296).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
RemoteFutureTense
|
Definition:
| RemoteFutureTense locates the situation in question at a
time that is considered relatively distant. It is characteristically after
the span of time culturally defined as 'tomorrow' (Dahl 1985:121; Comrie
1985:94).
|
Comment:
|
The affix kũ- in the first example may be used to mark either Hodiernal Past or Hodiernal Future depending on what aspect markers co-occur with it in the verb. Also, in the examples above, the final vowel of each verb is phonological, hence there is no correspondent for it in the interlinear gloss.
|
Example:
|
|
|
a -
2.SG-
|
kũ -
HODFUT-
|
nyu -
drink
|
a
|
|
|
|
| Kamau will drink porridge (within the day) |
|
|
|
|
a -
2.SG-
|
rĩĩ -
CLOSEFUT-
|
nyu -
drink
|
a
|
|
|
|
| Kamau will drink porridge (within the next few days) |
|
|
|
|
a -
2.SG-
|
rĩĩ -
REMFUT-
|
nyu -
drink
|
a
|
|
|
|
| Kamau will drink porridge (sometime beyond a few days from now) |
|
|
| Language: |
Gikuyu |
| Source: |
Mugane (1997) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
RemotePastTense
|
Definition:
| RemotePastTense locates the situation in question prior to
the present moment, usually more than a few days ago (Dahl 1985:121; Comrie
1985:88).
|
Comment:
|
Bybee, et al divide past tense systems into those that refer to daily cycles and those that do not. Typically, languages with past tenses that refer to a daily cycle will have tense that specifies 'today' and all others will refer to spans of time prior to 'today' (Bybee, et al 1994:99, Dahl 1985:125; Comrie 1985:93). Cocama is such a language. The examples above illustrate its three-way system of remoteness distinctions in the past tense.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| I went to town a long time ago |
|
|
|
|
tutsu -
go-
|
icuá
PREHODPST
|
|
|
| I went to town yesterday/a few days ago |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Cocama-cocamilla |
| Source: |
Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca (1994:98-99),Faust (1978) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SecondHandEvidential
|
Definition:
| SecondHandEvidential, also called the quotative, encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression from communicating with someone else (Palmer 2001: 40).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer refers to Secondhand Evidential as 'quotative'
|
Example:
|
|
|
apé -
play-
|
yigi
3.SG.PST-
SECEVID
|
|
|
| He played soccer (I obtained the information from someone else) |
|
|
| Language: |
Tuyuca |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:36),Barnes (1984),Malone (1988) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SelfConnectedObject
|
Definition:
| A SelfConnectedObject is any Object that does not consist of
two or more disconnected parts.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Set
|
Definition:
| SetOrClass that satisfies extensionality as well as other
constraints specified by some choice of set theory. Sets differ from
Classes in two important respects. First, Sets are extensional - two Sets
with the same elements are identical. Second, a Set can be an arbitrary
stock of objects. That is, there is no requirement that Sets have an
associated condition that determines their membership.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SetOrClass
|
Definition:
| The SetOrClass of Sets and Classes, i.e. any instance
of Abstract that has elements or instances.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SimpleOrthPart
|
Definition:
| SimpleOrthPart is the subclass of OrthPart whose members
cannt be decomposed further into other instances of
SimpleOrthPart.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SimpleOrthWord
|
Definition:
| A SimpleOrthWord has no internal parts which are also
WrittenLinguisticExpressions.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SimplePastTense
|
Definition:
| SimplePastTense is a very generic AbsolutePastTense which
locates the situation in question prior to the present moment, with no
specification on the distance in time (Comrie 1985).
|
Comment:
|
Bybee, et al indicate that Inuit manifests a 2-way past distinction that makes no reference to daily cycles. The two subdivisions they reference are given in the second and third examples. The first example, with the affix glossed as PERF, illustrates a past that Fortescue claims is often understood as a general experiential past without any specified time. This might be analyzed as a Simple Past.
|
Example:
|
Nuum -
Nuuk-
|
miis -
be.in-
|
sima -
PERF-
|
vunga
1.S.INDIC
|
|
|
| I have been to Nuuk |
|
|
tuqu -
die-
|
riikatap -
REMPST-
|
puq
3.SG.INDIC
|
|
|
| He died long ago |
|
|
niri -
eat-
|
qqammir -
RECPST-
|
punga
1.SG.INDIC
|
|
|
| I ate recently |
|
|
| Language: |
Inuktitut, Eastern Canadian |
| Source: |
Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca (1994:99),Fortescue (1984:272-3) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SizeValue
|
Definition:
| SizeValue is the class of values that may be associated with the feature instance 'size'. SizeValue is the class of all size types found in language.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SpatialCase
|
Definition:
| This subsumes cases that involve literal spatial arrangement, static or dynamic.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Speculative
|
Definition:
| Speculative encodes the fact that the speaker considers, or 'entertains', the content of the expression. That is, it is in the realm of possibility, though the speaker does not necessarilty believe it (Palmer 2001: 6-8, 25).
|
Comment:
|
Compare the first example above illustrating the Deductive 'cha'-form to the second example illustrating the Speculative 'sica' form in this language.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| At that time the baptismal certificate must have been incomplete (deduced) |
|
|
yuyanacurca -
they.were.thinking-
|
sica
DEDUCT
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I suppose they were thinking he was a child (speculated) |
|
|
| Language: |
Inga |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:27-28),Levinsohn (1975) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
StillTense
|
Definition:
| StillTense is similar to AbsolutePresentTense but carries
the presupposition that an event or state held before the moment of
utterance. In positive declarative clauses, still tense asserts that the
event or state holds at the moment of utterance (Comrie 1985:
54).
|
Example:
|
|
|
| you still sit/you are still seated |
|
|
| Language: |
Ganda |
| Source: |
Comrie (1985:54),Ashton, Mulira, Ndawula, and Tucker (1951) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SubablativeCase
|
Definition:
| SubablativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from under which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from under'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SuballativeCase
|
Definition:
| SuballativeCase expresses that something is moving toward the region that is under the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'towards the region that is under'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SubessiveCase
|
Definition:
| SubessiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it
marks is the location under which another referent exists. It has the
meaning of 'under' or 'beneath'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Subjunctive
|
Definition:
| Subjunctive
|
Comment:
|
The first example above, illustrating Indicative mood, may be compared with the second, which illustrates Subjunctive mood. Here, the subjunctive is used to express doubt about a proposition.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
aprende
learn-
3.SG.PRES.INDIC
|
|
|
| I believe that he is learning |
|
|
|
|
|
aprende
learn-
3.SG.PRES.INDIC
|
|
|
| I doubt that he is learning |
|
|
| Language: |
Spanish |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:5),Klein (1975) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SublativeCase
|
Definition:
| SublativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location under which another referent is moving toward. It has the meaning 'towards the underneath of'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SublexicalUnit
|
Definition:
| SublexicalUnit is the class of morphosyntactic unit which
may not be expressed alone and, hence, are bound to other morphosyntactic
units.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SubordinatingConnective
|
Definition:
| A subordinating connective is a connective that links constructions by making one of them a constituent of another. The subordinating conjunction typically marks the incorporated constituent (Crystal 1997:370; Mish et al. 1990:1175).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SubterminativeCase
|
Definition:
| SubterminativeCase expresses the notion of something moving into the region under the referent of the noun it marks, but not through that region. It has the meaning 'into the region under'.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SubtranslativeCase
|
Definition:
| SubtranslativeCase expresses the notion of something moving along a trajectory underneath the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'along the region underneath'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SuperablativeCase
|
Definition:
| SuperlativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it marks is the location from over which another referent is moving. It has the meaning 'from over'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SuperallativeCase
|
Definition:
| SuperallativeCase expresses that something is moving toward the region that is above the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'towards the region that is over'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SuperessiveCase
|
Definition:
| SuperessiveCase expresses that the referent of the noun it
marks is the location on which another referent exists. It has the meaning
of 'on' or 'upon'. (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 207, Gove, et al. 1966:
2293).
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SuperlativeCase
|
Definition:
| SuperlativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun it
marks is the location onto which another referent is moving. It has the
meaning of 'onto'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SuperterminativeCase
|
Definition:
| SuperterminativeCase expresses the notion of something moving into the region over the referent of the noun it marks, but not through that region. It has the meaning 'into the region over'.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SupertranslativeCase
|
Definition:
| SupertranslativeCase expresses the notion of something moving along a trajectory above the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'along the region over'.
|
Example:
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
lit
SG.SUPERESS
|
|
|
| on the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBESS
|
ʟ́
|
|
|
| under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INESS
|
a
|
|
|
| inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
um -
PL.INTERESS
|
če -
|
qɪ
|
|
|
| between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERLAT
|
t̄ -
|
iš
|
|
|
| onto the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBLAT
|
L'ak
|
|
|
| towards the underneath of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.ILL
|
a -
|
k
|
|
|
| into the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INTERLAT
|
qɪak
|
|
|
| towards the middle of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTLAT
|
rak
|
|
|
| in the vicinity of the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERABL
|
t̄iš
|
|
|
| from over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBABL
|
L'aš
|
|
|
| from under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
l -
SG.INABL
|
a -
|
ŝ
|
|
|
| from within the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERABL
|
qɪaŝ
|
|
|
| from between the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTABL
|
raš
|
|
|
| from near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERALL
|
t̄iši
|
|
|
| towards over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBALL
|
L'aši
|
|
|
| towards under the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INALL
|
aši
|
|
|
| towards inside the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
PL.INTERALL
|
um -
|
če -
|
qɪaši
|
|
|
| towards between the apples |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.CONTALL
|
rši
|
|
|
| towards near the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUPERTRANS
|
t̄iXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.SUBTRANS
|
L'aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTRANS
|
aXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
aɪnš -
apple-
|
li -
SG.INTERTRANS
|
qIaXut
|
|
|
| along the region over the apple |
|
|
| Language: |
Archi |
| Source: |
Kibrik (1998:470-1) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SymbolicString
|
Definition:
| SymbolicString is a sequence of one or more Characters.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
TenseValue
|
Definition:
| TenseValue is the class of values that may be associated
with the feature instance 'tense'. TenseValue is the class of all tense
types found in language.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
TerminativeCase
|
Definition:
| TerminativeCase expresses the notion of something into but not further than (ie, not through) the referent of the noun it marks. It has the meaning 'into but not through'.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ThirdHandEvidential
|
Definition:
| ThirdHandEvidential, also called the hearsay, encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression from a source generally considered less reliable than with a SecondHandEvidential (Palmer 2001: 40).
|
Comment:
|
The first example is understood to be 'hearsay from an unknown source', which is considered to be a Thirdhand Evidential. The second example is understood as 'hearsay from a known source', which is equivalent to a Secondhand Evidential in this language.
|
Example:
|
pe -
come-
|
sa -
PST-
|
pakae
HSYUNKNOWN
|
|
|
| [I've heard] it's coming |
|
|
pe -
come-
|
sa -
PST-
|
ripo
HSYKNOWN
|
|
|
| [I've heard] it's coming |
|
|
| Language: |
Fasu |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:41),Foley (1986),May (1980) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Timitive
|
Definition:
| Timitive encodes that the speaker fears somethings expressed in the proposition (Palmer 2001: 13, 22).
|
Comment:
|
Palmer notes that the Timitive Mood tends to be expressed with a verb of fearing plus a subjunctive verb in a subordinate clause.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
agueam
increase-
1.SG.PRES.SUBJ
|
|
|
| I am afraid that I shall increase my work |
|
|
| Language: |
Latin |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:133) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
TranslativeCase
|
Definition:
| TranslativeCase expresses that the referent of the noun, or the quality of the adjective, that it marks is the result of a process of change (Lyons 1968: 299301, Gove, et al. 1966: 813,2429, Sebeok 1946: 17, Hakulinen 1961: 70). X along, across Y.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Verb
|
Definition:
| A Verb is a part of speech whose members typically signal events and actions; constitute, singly or in a phrase, a minimal predicate in a clause; govern the number and types of other constituents which may occur in the clause; and, in inflectional languages, may be inflected for tense, aspect, voice, modality, or agreement with other constituents in person, number, or grammatical gender (Crystal 1997:409; Mish et al. 1990:1309; Give984:52; Payne 1997:47).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ViewPointAspect
|
Definition:
| ViewPointAspect is a deictic category that encodes the particilar way an event is represented, either as from within the event itself or from outside the event (Comrie 1976: 16-40; Give001: 289).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
VisualEvidential
|
Definition:
| VisualEvidential encodes the fact that the speaker came to believe the content of the expression through direct visual experience; they saw it (Palmer 2001: 57).
|
Comment:
|
Double notation with the visual evidential gloss in the first example is meant to indicate a circumfix. The second illustrates an Auditory Evidential.
|
Example:
|
a -
VIS-
|
pe -
come-
|
re
VIS
|
|
|
| [I see] it coming. |
|
|
pe -
come-
|
ra -
CUST-
|
rakae
AUD
|
|
|
| [I hear] it coming. |
|
|
| Language: |
Fasu |
| Source: |
Palmer (2001:38),Foley (1986) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
VocativeCase
|
Definition:
| VocativeCase marks a noun whose referent is being addressed (Crystal 1980: 377; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 251; Pei and Gaynor 1954: 228).
|
Comment:
|
Lake Miwok has ten case enclitics, illustrated in the examples. In the vocative example, the gram marked as VOC is specific to 'mother'. Other kinship terms have their own special vocative forms.
|
Example:
|
|
|
| A flea is sitting on your forehead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| He's standing in front of the king |
|
|
|
|
| He brought them to the king |
|
|
|
|
| The cat came out of there |
|
|
kaʔáppi -
father-
|
ni
COMIT
|
|
|
| I am walking with my father |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Miwok, Lake |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:204-6),Callaghan (1963) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Volitive
|
Definition:
| Volitive encodes that the speaker is willing to perform some action (Palmer 2001: 76).
|
Example:
|
t̓á -
VOL.1.SG-
|
hu·sáʔ
talk
|
|
|
| I'll talk |
|
|
tá -
HORT.1.SG-
|
hu·sáʔ
talk
|
|
|
| Let me talk! |
|
|
| Language: |
Shasta |
| Source: |
Mithin (1999:499),Silver (1966) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
WeakObligative
|
Definition:
| WeakObligative encodes that the subject 'should' perform the action expressed by the predicate (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 186-187).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
WrittenLinguisticExpression
|
Definition:
| This is the subclass of ContentBearingObjects that is considered to be part of a written language. That is, all instances of WrittenLinguisticExpression realize some LinguisticUnit, that is, they are based on some human language, possibly no longer spoken.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Adverbializer
|
Definition:
| An adverbializer is a subordinating connective that links a subordinate clause to a main clause, and indicates that the subordinate clause has an 'adverbial' or interpropositional relation to the main clause, indicating purpose, condition, time, and location.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Agreement
|
Definition:
| Agreement marks a morphosyntactic relation between two
constituents based on one or more grammatical categories.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Annotation
|
Definition:
| The relation between linguistic data and some other expression which provides some kind linguistic information other than what is explicitly given by the data.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Aspect
|
Definition:
| Aspect is the grammatical encoding of various
characteristics of the event referred to in an utterance. Aspect does not
form a semantically contiguous class (Comrie 1976; Bybee 1985; Sasse
2002).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Augmentative
|
Definition:
| Generally, a special form of a noun that signals that the object being referred to is large relative to the usual size of such an object (Crystal 1980: 34).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
CardinalNumeral
|
Definition:
| A cardinal numeral is a numeral of the class whose members are considered basic in form, are used in counting, and are used in expressing how many objects are referred to (Crystal 1997:52; Mish et al. 1990:207).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Case
|
Definition:
| Case is a grammatical encoding of the relationship
(syntactic or semantic) a noun bears to some other element in the sentence,
such as a verb, other noun, pronoun, or adposition(Pei and Gaynor 1954: 35;
Crystal 1980: 5354; Anderson 1985: 179180; Andrews 1985: 7172; Mish et al.
1990: 211; Kuno 1973: 45; Blake 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Classifier
|
Definition:
| A classifier is a partOfSpeech whose members express the classification of a noun (Crystal 1997:61; Mish et al. 1990:246; Payne 1997:107).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Complementizer
|
Definition:
| A complementizer is a connective which marks a complement clause (Crystal 1997:75).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
CorrelativeConnective
|
Definition:
| A correlative connective is either of a pair of coordinating conjunctions (connectives) used in ordered fashion. Typically, one is used immediately before each member of a pair of constituents (Crystal 1997:96; Mish et al. 1990:293).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DefiniteArticle
|
Definition:
| An article is a part of speech whose members refer to a specific, identifiable entity (or class of entities) (Crystal 1997:107).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Demonstrative
|
Definition:
| A demonstrative is a determiner that is used deictically to indicate a referent's spatial, temporal, or discourse location. A demonstrative functions as a modifier of a noun, or a pronoun (Crystal 1997:312; Mish et al. 1990:338).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Diminutive
|
Definition:
| Generally, a special form of a noun that signals that the object being referred to is small relative to the usual size of such an object. In some cases it may be used as a term of endearment (Crystal 1980: 116).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DistributiveNumeral
|
Definition:
| A distributive numeral is a numeral which expresses a group of the number specified.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
DitransitiveVerb
|
Definition:
| A ditransitive verb is a verb that takes two objects (Crystal 1997:397).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Dual
|
Definition:
| Dual number is number which refers to two members of a designated class (Crystal 1997: 265).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
EmphaticPronoun
|
Definition:
| An emphatic pronoun is a personal pronoun that is used to emphasize its referent.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Evaluative
|
Definition:
| Indicates a value that a speaker holds of an object being referred to.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ExistentialMarker
|
Definition:
| An existential marker is a partOfSpeech whose members are found in distinct clause types and which mark a referent's existence (Crystal 1997:142).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Expletive
|
Definition:
| An expletive (also known as a dummy word) is a part of speech whose members have no meaning, but complete a sentence to make it grammatical (Crystal 1997:127; Mish et al. 1990:437).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Feminine
|
Definition:
| A grammatical class of nouns whose members tend to be perceived of as female.
|
Comment:
|
In Chinook, some stems can take either masculine, feminine, or neuter prefixes, with concordant semantic impact on the word. Other stems take only one gender affix. The semantic basis for this classification is not completely transparent, but some tendencies do occur, e.g. large animals tend to be masculine while small ones tend to be feminine; qualities tend to be masculine while plants and related implements tend to be feminine; many neuter nouns are mass nouns
|
Example:
|
i -
MASC-
|
qʔiúqt
old.person
|
|
|
| old man |
|
|
|
|
a -
FEM-
|
qʔiúqt
old.person
|
|
|
| old woman |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Chinook |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:96-7),Hymes (1955:90-131) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FirstPerson
|
Definition:
| Reference to speaker(s), usually including themselves (Crystal 1997: 285).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FirstPersonExclusive
|
Definition:
| Distinction of the participants referred to, for example, speaker and others, but not hearer. Contrast with the FirstPersonInclusive (Crystal 1997: 285).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FirstPersonInclusive
|
Definition:
| Distinction of the particpants referred to, for example, speaker, hearer and others. Contrast with FirstPersonExclusive (Crystal 1997: 285).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
FreeTranslation
|
Definition:
| The relation between an orthographic expression in one language and some orthographic expression in another such that both expressions have exactly the same meaning.The words in the translation may not correspond to the those in the source expression.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Gerund
|
Definition:
| A part of speech derived from a verb and used as a noun, usually restricted to non-finite forms of the verb (Crystal 1997: 279).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
HasForm
|
Definition:
| This relation is included as a work-around, because string literals cannot be used as classes themselves, i.e., as subjects in an rdf graph. It expresses the substantial part of all written expressions.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
HasSense
|
Definition:
| This relation associates some LinguisticUnit with a SemanticUnit.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Inanimate
|
Definition:
| One of the two grammatical genders, or noun classes, of Nishnaabemwin, the other being animate. Membership in the inanimate grammatical class is largely based on meaning, in that non-living things, such as objects of manufacture and natural 'non-living' things are included in it (Valentine 2001: 114).
|
Example:
|
|
|
mEtEg#O -
tree-
|
g
ANIM-
PL
|
|
|
| trees |
|
|
mEtEg#O -
tree-
|
s
DIM-
INANIM
|
|
|
| stick |
|
|
mEtEg#O -
tree-
|
s -
DIM-
|
g
INANIM-
PL
|
|
|
| sticks |
|
|
| Language: |
Potawatomi |
| Source: |
Buszard-Welcher (unpublished field notes) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
IndefiniteArticle
|
Definition:
| An article is a part of speech whose members are used to refer to an entity (or class of entities) which is not capable of specific identification (Crystal 1997:193).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
IndefinitePronoun
|
Definition:
| An indefinite pronoun is a pronoun that belongs to a class whose members indicate indefinite reference (Crystal 1997: 312; Mish et al. 1990:612).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Interjection
|
Definition:
| An interjection is a part of speech, typically brief in form, such as one syllable or word, whose members are used most often as exclamations or parts of an exclamation. An interjection, typically expressing an emotional reaction, often with respect to an accompanying sentence, is not syntactically related to other accompanying expressions, and may include a combination of sounds not otherwise found in the language (Crystal 1997:200).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
InterrogativeProForm
|
Definition:
| An interrogative proForm is a proForm that is used in questions to stand for the item questioned.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
IntransitiveVerb
|
Definition:
| An intransitive verb is a verb that cannot take a direct object, and describes a property, state, or situation involving only one participant (Crystal 1997:397; Payne 1997:171).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
LiteralTranslation
|
Definition:
| The relation between an orthographic expression in one language and some orthographic expression in another such thatthe translation is done on a word by word basis without regard for the meaning of idioms [revise this definition].
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Masculine
|
Definition:
| A grammatical class of nouns whose members tend to be perceived of as male.
|
Comment:
|
In Chinook, some stems can take either masculine, feminine, or neuter prefixes, with concordant semantic impact on the word. Other stems take only one gender affix. The semantic basis for this classification is not completely transparent, but some tendencies do occur, e.g. large animals tend to be masculine while small ones tend to be feminine; qualities tend to be masculine while plants and related implements tend to be feminine; many neuter nouns are mass nouns
|
Example:
|
i -
MASC-
|
qʔiúqt
old.person
|
|
|
| old man |
|
|
|
|
a -
FEM-
|
qʔiúqt
old.person
|
|
|
| old woman |
|
|
|
|
| Language: |
Chinook |
| Source: |
Mithun (1999:96-7),Hymes (1955:90-131) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Matrix
|
Definition:
| Not necessarily a constituent itself, a matrix is the minimum unit such that when it is added to a clause, another clause is formed. A matrix takes a subordinate clause as an argument of a predicate within the matrix. In the sentence 'John thinks that Mary is sick', 'John thinks that' is the matrix.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Modality
|
Definition:
| Modality is the grammatical encoding of the speaker's
attitudes and opinions about the expressed proposition. Modality is
concerned with the encoding of the truth status of the expressed
proposition as well as the propositional attitudes such as fears, wants and
desires. Evidentiality is also closely related and is often part of the
formal modality system of a language. A distinction is often made between
modal and mood systems in the grammar. However, here they are conflated as
'modality' (Bybee, Perkins, and Pagliuca 1994: 176; Palmer 2001:
1).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
MultiplicativeNumeral
|
Definition:
| A multiplicative numeral is a numeral that expresses how many fold or how many times (Pei and Gaynor 1954:149; Hartmann and Stork 1972:147).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Names
|
Definition:
| This relation associates some written expression with any entity in the ontology. It labels or expresses that entity.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Negative
|
Definition:
| A construction that expresses the contradiction of some or all of a proposition (Crystal 1980: 257).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Number
|
Definition:
| Number is the grammatical encoding of cardinality, often
found on nouns, pronouns, and verbs. Number expresses count distinctions,
such as 'one' or 'more than one'. The count distinctions typically, but not
always,=20correspond to the actual count of the referents of the marked
noun or pronoun (Crystal 1980: 245; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 155; Mish et
al. 1990: 811).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
OrdinalNumeral
|
Definition:
| An ordinal numeral is a numeral belonging to a class whose members designate positions in a sequence (Crystal 1997:272; Mish et al. 1990:831).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PartOfSpeech
|
Definition:
| partOfSpeech also known as 'grammatical category' or
'lexical class', is the grammatical encoding of a lexical unit's syntactic
class. While a particular theory may not utilize the notion part of speech,
it is useful as part of a FeatureSystem. The set of part of speech values
for a particular language can be described based on how words behave in the
syntax (Payne 1997: 33; Maxwell, Simons, and Hayashi 2001).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Participle
|
Definition:
| A grammatical term referring to a word derived from a verb and used as an adjective (Crystal 1980: 279).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PartitiveNumeral
|
Definition:
| A partitive numeral is a numeral that expresses a fraction (Pei and Gaynor 1954:149; Hartmann and Stork 1972:165).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Paucal
|
Definition:
| Paucal number is number which refers to a few members of a designated class (Crystal 1997: 265).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Pejorative
|
Definition:
| A special form of a noun that indicates the speaker regards the person or object being referred to with distaste, contempt, or displeasure (Valentine 2001: 190-193).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Person
|
Definition:
| Person is the grammatical encoding of the number and nature
of the participants in a situation. Usually a three-way contrast is found:
first, second, and third person. Other formal distinctions in languages
include: inclusive/exlusive, honorific/intimate, and male/female (Crystal
1997: 285).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Plural
|
Definition:
| Plural number is number that expresses reference to a quantity greater than that expressed by the largest specific number category in a language, such as 'more than one' in English, and 'more than two' in some other languages (Crystal 1980: 245; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 178; Crystal 1987: 428; Mish et al. 1990: 906).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Polarity
|
Definition:
| A term used for the system of positive/negative contrastivity found in a language. The distinction may be expressed syntactically, morphologically, or lexically (Crystal 1980: 297).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Positive
|
Definition:
| In general, positive polarity refers to an assertion that contains no marker of negation (Crystal 1980: 299).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
PossessivePronoun
|
Definition:
| A possessive pronoun is a pronoun that expresses ownership and relationships like ownership, such as kinship, and other forms of association (Crystal 1997:312; Mish et al. 1990:918).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Postposition
|
Definition:
| A postposition is an adposition that occurs after its complement (Crystal 1997:300; Payne 1997:86).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Preferred
|
Definition:
| A special form of a noun that indicates the speaker regards the person or object being referred to with favor or admiration.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Prenoun
|
Definition:
| An element which may be compounded to the front of a noun to signal information such as size, color, etc. (Valentine 2001: 152-154).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Prenoun
|
Definition:
| An element which may be compounded to the front of a noun to signal information such as size, color, etc. (Valentine 2001: 152-154).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Preposition
|
Definition:
| A preposition is an adposition that occurs before its complement (Crystal 1997:305; Mish et al. 1990:929; Payne 1997:86).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Preverb
|
Definition:
| An element which may be compounded to the front of a verb, to signal information such as tense, direction, etc. (Valentine 2001: 154-158).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Preverb
|
Definition:
| An element which may be compounded to the front of a verb, to signal information such as tense, direction, etc. (Valentine 2001: 154-158).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ProAdjective
|
Definition:
| A proAdjective is a ProForm that substitutes for an adjective or adjective phrase.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ProAdverb
|
Definition:
| A proAdverb is a ProForm that substitutes for an adverb or other expression having an adverbial function.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
QuestionParticle
|
Definition:
| A particle is a part of speech whose members signal a yes/no question (Payne 1997:296).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Realization
|
Definition:
| This relation associates some LinguisticUnit with its corresponding OrthographicExpression.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ReciprocalPronoun
|
Definition:
| A reciprocal pronoun is a pronoun that expresses a mutual feeling or action among the referents of a plural subject (Crystal 1997:323; Mish et al. 1990:982).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ReflexivePronoun
|
Definition:
| A reflexive pronoun is a pronoun that has coreference with the subject (Mish et al. 1990:990).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
RelativePronoun
|
Definition:
| A relative pronoun is a pronoun that marks a relative clause, functions grammatically within the relative clause, and is coreferential to the word modified by the relative clause (Crystal 1997:329).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Relativizer
|
Definition:
| A relativizer is a subordinating connective that links a relative clause to its head noun. It is distinguishable from a relative pronoun in that it does not have a nominal function within the relative clause (Payne1997:332)
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SecondPerson
|
Definition:
| Normally used for person the speaker is addressing (Crystal 1997: 285).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Singular
|
Definition:
| Singular number is number that refers to one member of a designated class (Crystal 1980: 245; Hartmann and Stork 1972: 210).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Size
|
Definition:
| Indicates the perceived size of an object being referred to relative to the norm.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
SubordinateClause
|
Definition:
| A subordinate clause is a dependent clause that cannot stand on its own as a sentence. A matrix clause combined with a subordinate clause form a clause. In the sentence 'John thinks that Mary is sick', 'Mary is sick' is the subordinate clause.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Substantive
|
Definition:
| A substantive is a member of the syntactic class in which the names of physical, concrete, relatively unchanging experiences are most typically found whose members may act as subjects and objects, and most of whose members have inherently determined grammatical gender (in languages which inflect for gender) (Crystal 1997:264; Mish et al. 1990:808; Give984:51-52; Payne 1997:33).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Tense
|
Definition:
| Tense is the grammatical encoding of an event's location in
time. It is typically marked on the verb and deictically refers to the time
of the event or state denoted by the verb in relation to some other
temporal reference point (Comrie 1985: 9; Crystal 1987:
384).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
ThirdPerson
|
Definition:
| The manner in which other people, things, animals, etc. are referred to (Crystal 1997: 285).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
TransitiveVerb
|
Definition:
| A transitive verb is a verb that takes a direct object, and describes a relation between two participants (Crystal 1997:397; Mish et al. 1990:1254; Payne 1997:171).
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Translation
|
Definition:
| The relation between an orthographic expression in one language and some orthographic expression in another such that both expressions have the same or roughly the same meaning.
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
Trial
|
Definition:
| A trial number is a number that refers to three members of the designated class (Pei and Gaynor 1954: 220; Gove, et al. 1966: 2439).
|
Comment:
|
Corbett refers to this language as one with a 'true' trial. That is, there is a morpheme that refers to precisely three, as opposed to some reported trials that seem to have a paucal function.
|
Example:
|
|
|
|
|
iridu -
2.TRIAL-
|
ta -
NEG-
|
ʔeu
go
|
|
au -
1.SG-
|
na -
IRREAL-
|
wela
go.home
|
|
|
| If you three don't want to go, I'm going home |
|
|
| Language: |
Larike-wakasihu |
| Source: |
Corbett (2002:21),Ladig and Ladig (1990) |
|
|
| |
Concept:
|
VerbalParticle
|
Definition:
| A verbal particle is a member of a closed class of particles which co-occur with some verbs to form phrasal verbs. In some languages, verbal particles are identical to certain adpositions.
|
|